Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationali...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3372 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-33722024-03-20T07:03:27Z Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms KUNIMOTO, Takashi SARAN, Rene A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationalizable implementation”. Second, using the equivalence result, we identify weak robust monotonicity as a necessary and al-most sufficient condition for robust implementation in rationalizable strategies. This exhibits a contrast with robust implementation in interim equilibria, i.e., every equilib-rium on every type space achieves outcomes consistent with the SCF. Bergemann and Morris (2011) show that strict robust monotonicity is a necessary and almost sufficient condition for robust implementation in interim equilibria. We argue that strict robust monotonicity is strictly stronger than weak robust monotonicity, which further implies that, within general mechanisms, robust implementation in rationalizable strategies is more permissive than robust implementation in interim equilibria. The gap between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and that in interim equilibria stems from the strictly stronger nonemptiness requirement inherent in the latter concept. 2024-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Ex post incentive compatibility rationalizability interim equilibrium robust implementation weak rationalizable implementation weak robust monotonicity Economic Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Ex post incentive compatibility rationalizability interim equilibrium robust implementation weak rationalizable implementation weak robust monotonicity Economic Theory |
spellingShingle |
Ex post incentive compatibility rationalizability interim equilibrium robust implementation weak rationalizable implementation weak robust monotonicity Economic Theory KUNIMOTO, Takashi SARAN, Rene Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
description |
A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationalizable implementation”. Second, using the equivalence result, we identify weak robust monotonicity as a necessary and al-most sufficient condition for robust implementation in rationalizable strategies. This exhibits a contrast with robust implementation in interim equilibria, i.e., every equilib-rium on every type space achieves outcomes consistent with the SCF. Bergemann and Morris (2011) show that strict robust monotonicity is a necessary and almost sufficient condition for robust implementation in interim equilibria. We argue that strict robust monotonicity is strictly stronger than weak robust monotonicity, which further implies that, within general mechanisms, robust implementation in rationalizable strategies is more permissive than robust implementation in interim equilibria. The gap between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and that in interim equilibria stems from the strictly stronger nonemptiness requirement inherent in the latter concept. |
format |
text |
author |
KUNIMOTO, Takashi SARAN, Rene |
author_facet |
KUNIMOTO, Takashi SARAN, Rene |
author_sort |
KUNIMOTO, Takashi |
title |
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
title_short |
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
title_full |
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
title_sort |
robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf |
_version_ |
1794549874813829120 |