Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms

A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KUNIMOTO, Takashi, SARAN, Rene
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3372
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-33722024-03-20T07:03:27Z Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms KUNIMOTO, Takashi SARAN, Rene A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationalizable implementation”. Second, using the equivalence result, we identify weak robust monotonicity as a necessary and al-most sufficient condition for robust implementation in rationalizable strategies. This exhibits a contrast with robust implementation in interim equilibria, i.e., every equilib-rium on every type space achieves outcomes consistent with the SCF. Bergemann and Morris (2011) show that strict robust monotonicity is a necessary and almost sufficient condition for robust implementation in interim equilibria. We argue that strict robust monotonicity is strictly stronger than weak robust monotonicity, which further implies that, within general mechanisms, robust implementation in rationalizable strategies is more permissive than robust implementation in interim equilibria. The gap between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and that in interim equilibria stems from the strictly stronger nonemptiness requirement inherent in the latter concept. 2024-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Ex post incentive compatibility rationalizability interim equilibrium robust implementation weak rationalizable implementation weak robust monotonicity Economic Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Ex post incentive compatibility
rationalizability
interim equilibrium
robust implementation
weak rationalizable implementation
weak robust monotonicity
Economic Theory
spellingShingle Ex post incentive compatibility
rationalizability
interim equilibrium
robust implementation
weak rationalizable implementation
weak robust monotonicity
Economic Theory
KUNIMOTO, Takashi
SARAN, Rene
Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
description A social choice function (SCF) is robustly implementable in rationalizable strate-gies if every rationalizable strategy profile on every type space results in outcomes consistent with it. First, we establish an equivalence between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and “weak rationalizable implementation”. Second, using the equivalence result, we identify weak robust monotonicity as a necessary and al-most sufficient condition for robust implementation in rationalizable strategies. This exhibits a contrast with robust implementation in interim equilibria, i.e., every equilib-rium on every type space achieves outcomes consistent with the SCF. Bergemann and Morris (2011) show that strict robust monotonicity is a necessary and almost sufficient condition for robust implementation in interim equilibria. We argue that strict robust monotonicity is strictly stronger than weak robust monotonicity, which further implies that, within general mechanisms, robust implementation in rationalizable strategies is more permissive than robust implementation in interim equilibria. The gap between robust implementation in rationalizable strategies and that in interim equilibria stems from the strictly stronger nonemptiness requirement inherent in the latter concept.
format text
author KUNIMOTO, Takashi
SARAN, Rene
author_facet KUNIMOTO, Takashi
SARAN, Rene
author_sort KUNIMOTO, Takashi
title Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
title_short Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
title_full Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
title_fullStr Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
title_sort robust implementation in rationalizable strategies in general mechanisms
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2024
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2373
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3372/viewcontent/RoRat_Implementation_March_12_2024.pdf
_version_ 1794549874813829120