Sanctions: Where Law and Justice Collide: Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd v Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 39
This is a cautionary tale for litigation practitioners and their claimant clients. The decision emanates from the High Court of Singapore, but is equally applicable to any jurisdiction in which security for costs can be sought against the claimant in an action. In Singapore, the Rules of Court set o...
Saved in:
Main Author: | WONG, Denise Huiwen |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1265 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3218/viewcontent/CJQProof.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Do algorithms dream of mistaken contracts? Supreme Court case summary: Quoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltd
by: HAKIM, Lokman Bin Mohamed Rafi
Published: (2021) -
Video conference hearings in the Philippines: Prospects during normal times
by: Gomez, Gio Franco, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Recent developments in the offer to settle regime in Singapore: Accepting an offer to settle before damages are assessed and the Contra Proferentem Rule: Ong & Ong Pte Ltd v Fairview Developments Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 1285
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Representative proceedings in Singapore: Is the time ripe for reform?
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2021) -
What cases are to be heard by the Appellate Division and why: Noor Azlin bte Abdul Rahman and another v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd [2021] 2 SLR 440
by: NAI, Grace Jin Yi
Published: (2023)