Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another

The similar fact rule in Singapore—as with the law on any evidence law doctrine that can be found in both our Evidence Act and the common law—has required clarification for some time. This note, which discusses the latest local decision on the similar fact rule, considers if that decision is compati...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	CHEN, Siyuan
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:	Asian Studies Evidence
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1974 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3926/viewcontent/RevisitingSimilarFactRuleSingapore_2011_SJLS.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3926
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-39262020-06-08T06:57:19Z Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another CHEN, Siyuan The similar fact rule in Singapore—as with the law on any evidence law doctrine that can be found in both our Evidence Act and the common law—has required clarification for some time. This note, which discusses the latest local decision on the similar fact rule, considers if that decision is compatible with the Evidence Act and the various conceptualisations underlying the doctrine. 2011-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1974 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3926/viewcontent/RevisitingSimilarFactRuleSingapore_2011_SJLS.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Evidence
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	SMU Libraries
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	Asian Studies Evidence
spellingShingle	Asian Studies Evidence CHEN, Siyuan Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
description	The similar fact rule in Singapore—as with the law on any evidence law doctrine that can be found in both our Evidence Act and the common law—has required clarification for some time. This note, which discusses the latest local decision on the similar fact rule, considers if that decision is compatible with the Evidence Act and the various conceptualisations underlying the doctrine.
format	text
author	CHEN, Siyuan
author_facet	CHEN, Siyuan
author_sort	CHEN, Siyuan
title	Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
title_short	Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
title_full	Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
title_fullStr	Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
title_full_unstemmed	Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
title_sort	revisiting the similar fact rule in singapore: public prosecutor v. mas swan bin adnan and another
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	2011
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1974 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3926/viewcontent/RevisitingSimilarFactRuleSingapore_2011_SJLS.pdf
_version_	1772829351902969856

Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another

Similar Items