Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
The similar fact rule in Singapore—as with the law on any evidence law doctrine that can be found in both our Evidence Act and the common law—has required clarification for some time. This note, which discusses the latest local decision on the similar fact rule, considers if that decision is compati...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1974 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3926/viewcontent/RevisitingSimilarFactRuleSingapore_2011_SJLS.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Similar fact evidence in contractual interpretation: Bhoomatidevi d/o Kishinchand Chugani Mrs Kavita Gope Mirwani v Nantakumar s/o v Ramachandra and another [2023] SGHC 37
by: CHIRNSIDE, Calvin John Kaiwen
Published: (2024) -
Reliability and Relevance as the Touchstones for Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 [Case Note]
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2012) -
Recent developments concerning similar fact evidence in Singapore: Pushing the boundaries of admissibility – PP v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh [2017] 3 SLR 66; Micheal Anak Garing v PP [2017] 1 SLR 748
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2018) -
Expert Evidence and the Ultimate Issue Rule
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011)