In whose best interests? Regulating financial advisers, the Royal Commission, and the dilemma of reform
Following the Future of Financial Advice reforms, the ‘suitability’ and ‘appropriateness’ focus for financial advice has been relocated and supplemented by a ‘best interests’ focus in s 961B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Yet, as the Australian Government’s Royal Commission into Misconduct in t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | LIU, Han-wei, LE, Toan, HE, Weiping, DUFFY, Michael |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4398 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6356/viewcontent/SSRN_id3678359.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Rebuilding trust: Regulation of financial advisers in the UK
by: HE, Weiping, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Regulating financial advisers in the UK: Lessons for Australia
by: HE, Weiping, et al.
Published: (2021) -
COB regulation of financial advisers
by: LOW, Kee Yang
Published: (2019) -
Product suitability, due diligence and management responsibility: The new regime of regulation 18B of the financial advisers regulations
by: LOW, Kee Yang
Published: (2012) -
The balanced scorecard framework for financial advisers: A Pandora's box
by: LOW, Kee Yang
Published: (2016)