Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making

What is a “rational” decision? Economists traditionally viewed rationality as maximizing expected satisfaction. This view has been useful in modeling basic microeconomic concepts, but falls short in accounting for many everyday human decisions. It leaves unanswered why some things reliably make peop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KENRICK, Douglas T., GRISKEVICIUS, Vladas, SUNDIE, Jill M., LI, Norman P., LI, Jessica Yexin, NEUBERG, Steven L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/727
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1726/viewcontent/nihms101580.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1726
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-17262019-07-22T13:42:33Z Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making KENRICK, Douglas T. GRISKEVICIUS, Vladas SUNDIE, Jill M. LI, Norman P. LI, Jessica Yexin NEUBERG, Steven L. What is a “rational” decision? Economists traditionally viewed rationality as maximizing expected satisfaction. This view has been useful in modeling basic microeconomic concepts, but falls short in accounting for many everyday human decisions. It leaves unanswered why some things reliably make people more satisfied than others, and why people frequently act to make others happy at a cost to themselves. Drawing on an evolutionary perspective, we propose that people make decisions according to a set of principles that may not appear to make sense at the superficial level, but that demonstrate rationality at a deeper evolutionary level. By this, we mean that people use adaptive domain-specific decision-rules that, on average, would have resulted in fitness benefits. Using this framework, we re-examine several economic principles. We suggest that traditional psychological functions governing risk aversion, discounting of future benefits, and budget allocations to multiple goods, for example, vary in predictable ways as a function of the underlying motive of the decision-maker and individual differences linked to evolved life-history strategies. A deep rationality framework not only helps explain why people make the decisions they do, but also inspires multiple directions for future research. 2009-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/727 info:doi/10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1726/viewcontent/nihms101580.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University gender-differences sex-differences physical attractiveness probabilistic rewards parental investment mate preferences romantic motives trade-offs perspective cognition Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic gender-differences
sex-differences
physical attractiveness
probabilistic rewards
parental investment
mate preferences
romantic motives
trade-offs
perspective
cognition
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
spellingShingle gender-differences
sex-differences
physical attractiveness
probabilistic rewards
parental investment
mate preferences
romantic motives
trade-offs
perspective
cognition
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
KENRICK, Douglas T.
GRISKEVICIUS, Vladas
SUNDIE, Jill M.
LI, Norman P.
LI, Jessica Yexin
NEUBERG, Steven L.
Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
description What is a “rational” decision? Economists traditionally viewed rationality as maximizing expected satisfaction. This view has been useful in modeling basic microeconomic concepts, but falls short in accounting for many everyday human decisions. It leaves unanswered why some things reliably make people more satisfied than others, and why people frequently act to make others happy at a cost to themselves. Drawing on an evolutionary perspective, we propose that people make decisions according to a set of principles that may not appear to make sense at the superficial level, but that demonstrate rationality at a deeper evolutionary level. By this, we mean that people use adaptive domain-specific decision-rules that, on average, would have resulted in fitness benefits. Using this framework, we re-examine several economic principles. We suggest that traditional psychological functions governing risk aversion, discounting of future benefits, and budget allocations to multiple goods, for example, vary in predictable ways as a function of the underlying motive of the decision-maker and individual differences linked to evolved life-history strategies. A deep rationality framework not only helps explain why people make the decisions they do, but also inspires multiple directions for future research.
format text
author KENRICK, Douglas T.
GRISKEVICIUS, Vladas
SUNDIE, Jill M.
LI, Norman P.
LI, Jessica Yexin
NEUBERG, Steven L.
author_facet KENRICK, Douglas T.
GRISKEVICIUS, Vladas
SUNDIE, Jill M.
LI, Norman P.
LI, Jessica Yexin
NEUBERG, Steven L.
author_sort KENRICK, Douglas T.
title Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
title_short Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
title_full Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
title_fullStr Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making
title_sort deep rationality: the evolutionary economics of decision making
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/727
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1726/viewcontent/nihms101580.pdf
_version_ 1770568230237110272