GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Objectives The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting We developed this guidance based on the GRAD...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Pottie, Vivian Welch, Rachael Morton, Elie A. Akl, Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach, Vittal Katikireddi, Jasvinder Singh, Lorenzo Moja, Eddy Lang, Nicola Magrini, Lehana Thabane, Roger Stanev, Elizabeth Matovinovic, Alexandra Snellman, Matthias Briel, Beverly Shea, Peter Tugwell, Holger Schunemann, Gordon Guyatt, Pablo Alonso-Coello
Format: Journal
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028671735&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57609
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-57609
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-576092018-09-05T03:46:48Z GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process Kevin Pottie Vivian Welch Rachael Morton Elie A. Akl Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach Vittal Katikireddi Jasvinder Singh Lorenzo Moja Eddy Lang Nicola Magrini Lehana Thabane Roger Stanev Elizabeth Matovinovic Alexandra Snellman Matthias Briel Beverly Shea Peter Tugwell Holger Schunemann Gordon Guyatt Pablo Alonso-Coello Medicine © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Objectives The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup. 2018-09-05T03:46:48Z 2018-09-05T03:46:48Z 2017-10-01 Journal 18785921 08954356 2-s2.0-85028671735 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028671735&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57609
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Kevin Pottie
Vivian Welch
Rachael Morton
Elie A. Akl
Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach
Vittal Katikireddi
Jasvinder Singh
Lorenzo Moja
Eddy Lang
Nicola Magrini
Lehana Thabane
Roger Stanev
Elizabeth Matovinovic
Alexandra Snellman
Matthias Briel
Beverly Shea
Peter Tugwell
Holger Schunemann
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
description © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Objectives The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.
format Journal
author Kevin Pottie
Vivian Welch
Rachael Morton
Elie A. Akl
Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach
Vittal Katikireddi
Jasvinder Singh
Lorenzo Moja
Eddy Lang
Nicola Magrini
Lehana Thabane
Roger Stanev
Elizabeth Matovinovic
Alexandra Snellman
Matthias Briel
Beverly Shea
Peter Tugwell
Holger Schunemann
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
author_facet Kevin Pottie
Vivian Welch
Rachael Morton
Elie A. Akl
Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach
Vittal Katikireddi
Jasvinder Singh
Lorenzo Moja
Eddy Lang
Nicola Magrini
Lehana Thabane
Roger Stanev
Elizabeth Matovinovic
Alexandra Snellman
Matthias Briel
Beverly Shea
Peter Tugwell
Holger Schunemann
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
author_sort Kevin Pottie
title GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
title_short GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
title_full GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
title_fullStr GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
title_full_unstemmed GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
title_sort grade equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in grade guideline development: evidence to decision process
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028671735&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57609
_version_ 1681424910598012928