STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
The implementation of the Last Planner System (LPS), specifically in production planning, has not been done optimally by several countries, including Indonesia. It is indicated by some previous studies that states the implementation of Lookahead Planning (LAP), Weekly Work Planning (WWP), and Lea...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80754 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The implementation of the Last Planner System (LPS), specifically in production
planning, has not been done optimally by several countries, including Indonesia. It
is indicated by some previous studies that states the implementation of Lookahead
Planning (LAP), Weekly Work Planning (WWP), and Learning is still partial, with
some aspects are not being carried out due to various challenges that are faced by
project team. However, LAP and WWP, as part of production planning, are the
most crucial aspects of LPS. Therefore, this research is conducted to fill the gap by
studying construction projects in Indonesia that are implementing LPS, specifically
in production planning. The study consists of identifying the extent of production
planning adoption by PT. A, identifying the extent of its implementation in a project
construction, and identifying the challenges faced by project teams during
production planning. Data for this research were collected through observations
and interviews with those who directly involved in production planning, both at the
company level (PT. A) and project team in construction site (Project X), to obtain
a comparison of production planning between LPS theory, company adoption, and
site implementation. Based on descriptive analysis, it was found that the adoption
by PT. A has not fully complied with the existing of LPS theory, fulfilling only 4 out
of 6 aspects. Meanwhile, the WWP and Learning stages have fulfilled all aspects of
the theory. The implementation at Project X, as a benchmark project at PT. A, is
still partial, with some aspects are not carried out. It is indicated by the LAP stage
that is no longer being used, resulting in the process of explosion, constraint
analysis, and make ready are not being carried out. Then, in the WWP stage, only
1 out of 4 aspects were implemented, and in the Learning stage, only 1 out of 3
aspects were implemented. Partial implementation was found in several projects
both in Indonesia and abroad that have been implementing LPS for a longer time,
where constraint analysis and make-ready processes are challenging to
consistently implemented. Therefore, it can be said that the implementation of
production planning, especially the LAP stage, still faces many challenges. The
most identified challenges are from the users, it is project team's understanding of
production planning concepts, which affects the implementation in the construction
site. The approach that should be done in LPS implementation is not only focus on
the implementation of its tools but also should doing the change management, including changes in working methods, mindset, behavior, and culture within the
organization. |
---|