STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X

The implementation of the Last Planner System (LPS), specifically in production planning, has not been done optimally by several countries, including Indonesia. It is indicated by some previous studies that states the implementation of Lookahead Planning (LAP), Weekly Work Planning (WWP), and Lea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80754
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:80754
spelling id-itb.:807542024-03-07T08:54:07ZSTUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr Teknik sipil Indonesia Theses Last Planner System, production planning, adoption, implementation INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80754 The implementation of the Last Planner System (LPS), specifically in production planning, has not been done optimally by several countries, including Indonesia. It is indicated by some previous studies that states the implementation of Lookahead Planning (LAP), Weekly Work Planning (WWP), and Learning is still partial, with some aspects are not being carried out due to various challenges that are faced by project team. However, LAP and WWP, as part of production planning, are the most crucial aspects of LPS. Therefore, this research is conducted to fill the gap by studying construction projects in Indonesia that are implementing LPS, specifically in production planning. The study consists of identifying the extent of production planning adoption by PT. A, identifying the extent of its implementation in a project construction, and identifying the challenges faced by project teams during production planning. Data for this research were collected through observations and interviews with those who directly involved in production planning, both at the company level (PT. A) and project team in construction site (Project X), to obtain a comparison of production planning between LPS theory, company adoption, and site implementation. Based on descriptive analysis, it was found that the adoption by PT. A has not fully complied with the existing of LPS theory, fulfilling only 4 out of 6 aspects. Meanwhile, the WWP and Learning stages have fulfilled all aspects of the theory. The implementation at Project X, as a benchmark project at PT. A, is still partial, with some aspects are not carried out. It is indicated by the LAP stage that is no longer being used, resulting in the process of explosion, constraint analysis, and make ready are not being carried out. Then, in the WWP stage, only 1 out of 4 aspects were implemented, and in the Learning stage, only 1 out of 3 aspects were implemented. Partial implementation was found in several projects both in Indonesia and abroad that have been implementing LPS for a longer time, where constraint analysis and make-ready processes are challenging to consistently implemented. Therefore, it can be said that the implementation of production planning, especially the LAP stage, still faces many challenges. The most identified challenges are from the users, it is project team's understanding of production planning concepts, which affects the implementation in the construction site. The approach that should be done in LPS implementation is not only focus on the implementation of its tools but also should doing the change management, including changes in working methods, mindset, behavior, and culture within the organization. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Teknik sipil
spellingShingle Teknik sipil
Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr
STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
description The implementation of the Last Planner System (LPS), specifically in production planning, has not been done optimally by several countries, including Indonesia. It is indicated by some previous studies that states the implementation of Lookahead Planning (LAP), Weekly Work Planning (WWP), and Learning is still partial, with some aspects are not being carried out due to various challenges that are faced by project team. However, LAP and WWP, as part of production planning, are the most crucial aspects of LPS. Therefore, this research is conducted to fill the gap by studying construction projects in Indonesia that are implementing LPS, specifically in production planning. The study consists of identifying the extent of production planning adoption by PT. A, identifying the extent of its implementation in a project construction, and identifying the challenges faced by project teams during production planning. Data for this research were collected through observations and interviews with those who directly involved in production planning, both at the company level (PT. A) and project team in construction site (Project X), to obtain a comparison of production planning between LPS theory, company adoption, and site implementation. Based on descriptive analysis, it was found that the adoption by PT. A has not fully complied with the existing of LPS theory, fulfilling only 4 out of 6 aspects. Meanwhile, the WWP and Learning stages have fulfilled all aspects of the theory. The implementation at Project X, as a benchmark project at PT. A, is still partial, with some aspects are not carried out. It is indicated by the LAP stage that is no longer being used, resulting in the process of explosion, constraint analysis, and make ready are not being carried out. Then, in the WWP stage, only 1 out of 4 aspects were implemented, and in the Learning stage, only 1 out of 3 aspects were implemented. Partial implementation was found in several projects both in Indonesia and abroad that have been implementing LPS for a longer time, where constraint analysis and make-ready processes are challenging to consistently implemented. Therefore, it can be said that the implementation of production planning, especially the LAP stage, still faces many challenges. The most identified challenges are from the users, it is project team's understanding of production planning concepts, which affects the implementation in the construction site. The approach that should be done in LPS implementation is not only focus on the implementation of its tools but also should doing the change management, including changes in working methods, mindset, behavior, and culture within the organization.
format Theses
author Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr
author_facet Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr
author_sort Nadya Pramesti Dwi Putranti, Rr
title STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
title_short STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
title_full STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
title_fullStr STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
title_full_unstemmed STUDY OF PRODUCTION PLANNING IN LAST PLANNER SYSTEM (LPS) IMPLEMENTATION :CASE STUDY OF PROJECT X
title_sort study of production planning in last planner system (lps) implementation :case study of project x
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80754
_version_ 1822996936203960320