A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila

In this descriptive comparative study, the problem was to examine whether Grade One Children coming from 5 types of schools namely Traditional, Montessori, Progressive, Developmental-Interaction, and Eclectic, with different philosophies and approaches, differ in their personality, since each type e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3566
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10404/viewcontent/CDTG004343_P.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-10404
record_format eprints
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic First grade (Education)
School children
Primary school students
Personality
Early Childhood Education
Education
spellingShingle First grade (Education)
School children
Primary school students
Personality
Early Childhood Education
Education
Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co
A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
description In this descriptive comparative study, the problem was to examine whether Grade One Children coming from 5 types of schools namely Traditional, Montessori, Progressive, Developmental-Interaction, and Eclectic, with different philosophies and approaches, differ in their personality, since each type employs its own philosophy and approach which influence the development of personality. It also wanted to find out whether Grade One children coming from the different selected schools differ in terms of gender, family structure, socio-economic status, and birth order. 50 Grade One Children, 10 from each of the 5 schools, who met the criteria regular Filipino students who had at least one year of previous schooling in the same school where they are currently enrolled in, were randomly selected. Gender was equally distributed per school. The Personality Assessment for the Filipino Child by Dr. Trinidad Opiniano-Abenojar was personally administered by the researcher to the children. It measured 8 personality dimensions: Affiliation, Courtesy, Obedience, Humility, Understanding, Trust, Thoughtfulness, and Helpfulness. Results of the One-way ANOVA showed that there were NO significant differences in each of the personality dimensions and overall personality profiles of Grade One Children coming from the 5 types of schools. However, the results might be due to the relatively small sample size. Based on the qualitative data, children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) significantly differed in the dimensions of Affiliation, Courtesy, Understanding, and Thoughtfulness; children from SCHOOL C (Progressive) significantly differed in the dimensions of Obedience and Humility; and children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) and SCHOOL D (Developmental-Interaction) significantly differed in the dimension of Trust among the schools. NO significant differences were found in the dimension of Helpfulness. Children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) also differed in the overall personality profile among the schools. These indicate that school philosophy and approach almost certainly is a significant factor in the development of the dimensions measured in this study. The differences are probably also due to other factors than school philosophy and approach. As for the other variables, findings show support for previous studies conducted locally and internationally except for gender. Females are generally Well Adjusted than males probably because the dimensions measured in this study are more expected of females than males. No meaningful conclusion could be drawn out of family structure because 82% of the sample came from two-parent families. However, it could be noted that children from other categories still obtained ratings of Fairly Adjusted and Well Adjusted when we look at their individual ratings, implying that children obtained a better personality probably because they are given consistent love, care, support and attention by their families, friends, and society. NO differences were found for socio-economic status (limited to Class A, B, and C) in the dimensions of Affiliation, Courtesy, Understanding, and Helpfulness. Class A children significantly differed in the dimensions of Obedience and Humility. Class C children significantly differed in the dimensions of Trust and Thoughtfulness. Nevertheless, NO differences were found in the overall personality profiles among the three social classes. For birth order, first or eldest children differed in the dimensions of Affiliation, Humility, Understanding, Trust, and Thoughtfulness and in the overall personality profile among the other birth order groups.
format text
author Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co
author_facet Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co
author_sort Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co
title A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
title_short A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
title_full A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila
title_sort comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in metro manila
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2006
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3566
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10404/viewcontent/CDTG004343_P.pdf
_version_ 1779260524780847104
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-104042023-10-04T11:29:47Z A comparative analysis of the personality of grade one children from selected schools in Metro Manila Buenaventura, Cherrelaine Co In this descriptive comparative study, the problem was to examine whether Grade One Children coming from 5 types of schools namely Traditional, Montessori, Progressive, Developmental-Interaction, and Eclectic, with different philosophies and approaches, differ in their personality, since each type employs its own philosophy and approach which influence the development of personality. It also wanted to find out whether Grade One children coming from the different selected schools differ in terms of gender, family structure, socio-economic status, and birth order. 50 Grade One Children, 10 from each of the 5 schools, who met the criteria regular Filipino students who had at least one year of previous schooling in the same school where they are currently enrolled in, were randomly selected. Gender was equally distributed per school. The Personality Assessment for the Filipino Child by Dr. Trinidad Opiniano-Abenojar was personally administered by the researcher to the children. It measured 8 personality dimensions: Affiliation, Courtesy, Obedience, Humility, Understanding, Trust, Thoughtfulness, and Helpfulness. Results of the One-way ANOVA showed that there were NO significant differences in each of the personality dimensions and overall personality profiles of Grade One Children coming from the 5 types of schools. However, the results might be due to the relatively small sample size. Based on the qualitative data, children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) significantly differed in the dimensions of Affiliation, Courtesy, Understanding, and Thoughtfulness; children from SCHOOL C (Progressive) significantly differed in the dimensions of Obedience and Humility; and children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) and SCHOOL D (Developmental-Interaction) significantly differed in the dimension of Trust among the schools. NO significant differences were found in the dimension of Helpfulness. Children from SCHOOL B (Montessori) also differed in the overall personality profile among the schools. These indicate that school philosophy and approach almost certainly is a significant factor in the development of the dimensions measured in this study. The differences are probably also due to other factors than school philosophy and approach. As for the other variables, findings show support for previous studies conducted locally and internationally except for gender. Females are generally Well Adjusted than males probably because the dimensions measured in this study are more expected of females than males. No meaningful conclusion could be drawn out of family structure because 82% of the sample came from two-parent families. However, it could be noted that children from other categories still obtained ratings of Fairly Adjusted and Well Adjusted when we look at their individual ratings, implying that children obtained a better personality probably because they are given consistent love, care, support and attention by their families, friends, and society. NO differences were found for socio-economic status (limited to Class A, B, and C) in the dimensions of Affiliation, Courtesy, Understanding, and Helpfulness. Class A children significantly differed in the dimensions of Obedience and Humility. Class C children significantly differed in the dimensions of Trust and Thoughtfulness. Nevertheless, NO differences were found in the overall personality profiles among the three social classes. For birth order, first or eldest children differed in the dimensions of Affiliation, Humility, Understanding, Trust, and Thoughtfulness and in the overall personality profile among the other birth order groups. 2006-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3566 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10404/viewcontent/CDTG004343_P.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository First grade (Education) School children Primary school students Personality Early Childhood Education Education