Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change

This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial des...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim, Hye Kyung, Lee, Tae Kyoung
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-142803
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1428032020-07-01T06:55:24Z Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change Kim, Hye Kyung Lee, Tae Kyoung Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Narrative Perspective This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial design having smoker's stage of change (precontemplation vs. contemplation/preparation) as a moderator. We observed differential framing effects depending on smoker's current stages of change only when they were exposed to first-person narratives. For precontemplators, a loss-framed (vs. a gain-framed) first-person narrative induced greater quit intentions and stage progression. Conversely, among contemplators and preparers, a gain-framed (vs. a loss-framed) first-person narrative led to greater quit intentions and stage progression. These interactive patterns were partly mediated by self-referencing and perceived similarity. This study proposes an alternative mechanism to explain the conditional framing effect by stages of change and highlights the importance of tailoring messages to smoker's psychosocial characteristics and needs. Accepted version 2020-07-01T06:55:24Z 2020-07-01T06:55:24Z 2017 Journal Article Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2017). Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990-998. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 1081-0730 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803 10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 29199898 2-s2.0-85036577119 12 22 990 998 en Journal of Health Communication This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Health Communication on 04 Dec 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Message Framing
Narrative Perspective
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Message Framing
Narrative Perspective
Kim, Hye Kyung
Lee, Tae Kyoung
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
description This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial design having smoker's stage of change (precontemplation vs. contemplation/preparation) as a moderator. We observed differential framing effects depending on smoker's current stages of change only when they were exposed to first-person narratives. For precontemplators, a loss-framed (vs. a gain-framed) first-person narrative induced greater quit intentions and stage progression. Conversely, among contemplators and preparers, a gain-framed (vs. a loss-framed) first-person narrative led to greater quit intentions and stage progression. These interactive patterns were partly mediated by self-referencing and perceived similarity. This study proposes an alternative mechanism to explain the conditional framing effect by stages of change and highlights the importance of tailoring messages to smoker's psychosocial characteristics and needs.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Kim, Hye Kyung
Lee, Tae Kyoung
format Article
author Kim, Hye Kyung
Lee, Tae Kyoung
author_sort Kim, Hye Kyung
title Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
title_short Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
title_full Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
title_fullStr Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
title_full_unstemmed Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
title_sort conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803
_version_ 1681059232670023680