Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change
This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial des...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-142803 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1428032020-07-01T06:55:24Z Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change Kim, Hye Kyung Lee, Tae Kyoung Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Narrative Perspective This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial design having smoker's stage of change (precontemplation vs. contemplation/preparation) as a moderator. We observed differential framing effects depending on smoker's current stages of change only when they were exposed to first-person narratives. For precontemplators, a loss-framed (vs. a gain-framed) first-person narrative induced greater quit intentions and stage progression. Conversely, among contemplators and preparers, a gain-framed (vs. a loss-framed) first-person narrative led to greater quit intentions and stage progression. These interactive patterns were partly mediated by self-referencing and perceived similarity. This study proposes an alternative mechanism to explain the conditional framing effect by stages of change and highlights the importance of tailoring messages to smoker's psychosocial characteristics and needs. Accepted version 2020-07-01T06:55:24Z 2020-07-01T06:55:24Z 2017 Journal Article Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2017). Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990-998. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 1081-0730 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803 10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 29199898 2-s2.0-85036577119 12 22 990 998 en Journal of Health Communication This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Health Communication on 04 Dec 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Narrative Perspective |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Narrative Perspective Kim, Hye Kyung Lee, Tae Kyoung Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
description |
This study examines how current smokers respond differently to gain-loss-framed antismoking narratives depending on their stages of change to quit smoking. An experiment (N = 461) was conducted with a 2 (narrative perspective: first person vs. third person) × 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial design having smoker's stage of change (precontemplation vs. contemplation/preparation) as a moderator. We observed differential framing effects depending on smoker's current stages of change only when they were exposed to first-person narratives. For precontemplators, a loss-framed (vs. a gain-framed) first-person narrative induced greater quit intentions and stage progression. Conversely, among contemplators and preparers, a gain-framed (vs. a loss-framed) first-person narrative led to greater quit intentions and stage progression. These interactive patterns were partly mediated by self-referencing and perceived similarity. This study proposes an alternative mechanism to explain the conditional framing effect by stages of change and highlights the importance of tailoring messages to smoker's psychosocial characteristics and needs. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Kim, Hye Kyung Lee, Tae Kyoung |
format |
Article |
author |
Kim, Hye Kyung Lee, Tae Kyoung |
author_sort |
Kim, Hye Kyung |
title |
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
title_short |
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
title_full |
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
title_fullStr |
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
title_sort |
conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142803 |
_version_ |
1681059232670023680 |