The impact of collaborative cues on perceived credibility of websites

Recent technological advancements have helped give rise to a variety of websites offering user-generated content. Through the use of focus groups and an experiment, this study systematically examines how specific attributes of collaborative websites affect credibility judgments. From the focus gr...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Helen Nofrina, Chen, Peiqi, Thanomwong Poorisat, Viswanathan Vani
其他作者: Detenber, Benjamin
格式: Final Year Project
語言:English
出版: 2009
主題:
在線閱讀:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/14862
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Nanyang Technological University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:Recent technological advancements have helped give rise to a variety of websites offering user-generated content. Through the use of focus groups and an experiment, this study systematically examines how specific attributes of collaborative websites affect credibility judgments. From the focus groups, influential collaborative features identified were the editing features, discussion board and edit history. In addition, the presence of references was seen as an important factor which helps to enhance website credibility. Despite the perceived advantages of collaborative features such as unbiased and more up-to-date information, there were some concerns about possible vandalism and the inaccuracy of information. Based on the focus group findings, a between-subjects experimental study was conducted to examine the effect of the type of website and the presence of references on credibility assessment. The results show that there is no significant difference in site credibility between collaborative and non-collaborative websites, regardless of the presence of references. Further analyses suggest that collaborative cues may even have negative impact on the websites. From the experimental results, it was also found that the degree of involvement, prior knowledge of topic and time spent viewing the website were found to be positively related to site credibility. Similarly, the focus group results show that highly involved respondents also identified message characteristics as another factor influencing their credibility judgments. Nevertheless, the experiment findings suggest that the importance of collaborative features and references might have been overemphasized in the focus group discussions due to the setting encouraging participants to be mindful of their responses.