Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance

Background: Training for muscular endurance is important for Singapore’s uniformed reservist as it is tested annually with the 1-minute bodyweight push-up and sit-up test. Following the principle of specificity, training at a fast movement velocity (tempo) is optimal for the two muscular endurance t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ong, Jacky Hou An
Other Authors: -
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153074
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-153074
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1530742021-11-07T20:10:41Z Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance Ong, Jacky Hou An - Heng Shu Mei Karen karen.heng@nie.edu.sg Science::Biological sciences::Human anatomy and physiology Background: Training for muscular endurance is important for Singapore’s uniformed reservist as it is tested annually with the 1-minute bodyweight push-up and sit-up test. Following the principle of specificity, training at a fast movement velocity (tempo) is optimal for the two muscular endurance tests. Alternatively, a slow tempo increases muscular time under tension and fatigue, which are key to muscular endurance enhancement. Yet, there is a lack of studies comparing the effect of both training velocities on muscular endurance performance. Hence, this study aims to compare between training with a fast and slow tempo, and to determine which tempo is better at improving muscular endurance performance. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial design, 15 recreationally strength-trained males were assigned to either a fast-tempo, slow-tempo, or control group. Subjects in the training groups underwent 2 days per week of bodyweight training for 4 weeks, while those in the control group did not receive any training. The fast-tempo group completed each repetition with a duration of 1-s eccentric and 1-s concentric contraction, whereas those in the slow-tempo did 4-s eccentric and 1-s concentric contraction. Pre- and post-test measures include the maximum number of push-ups and sit-ups completed in 1 minute. Results: Improvement in the 1-minute push-up and sit-up test was not significantly different between both training groups (p > .05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that performance improvement for the 1-minute push-up and sit-up muscular endurance test are the same for both fast and slow bodyweight resistance training tempo. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2021-11-05T05:47:10Z 2021-11-05T05:47:10Z 2021 Final Year Project (FYP) Ong, J. H. A. (2021). Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153074 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153074 en IRB-2021-237 application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Biological sciences::Human anatomy and physiology
spellingShingle Science::Biological sciences::Human anatomy and physiology
Ong, Jacky Hou An
Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
description Background: Training for muscular endurance is important for Singapore’s uniformed reservist as it is tested annually with the 1-minute bodyweight push-up and sit-up test. Following the principle of specificity, training at a fast movement velocity (tempo) is optimal for the two muscular endurance tests. Alternatively, a slow tempo increases muscular time under tension and fatigue, which are key to muscular endurance enhancement. Yet, there is a lack of studies comparing the effect of both training velocities on muscular endurance performance. Hence, this study aims to compare between training with a fast and slow tempo, and to determine which tempo is better at improving muscular endurance performance. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial design, 15 recreationally strength-trained males were assigned to either a fast-tempo, slow-tempo, or control group. Subjects in the training groups underwent 2 days per week of bodyweight training for 4 weeks, while those in the control group did not receive any training. The fast-tempo group completed each repetition with a duration of 1-s eccentric and 1-s concentric contraction, whereas those in the slow-tempo did 4-s eccentric and 1-s concentric contraction. Pre- and post-test measures include the maximum number of push-ups and sit-ups completed in 1 minute. Results: Improvement in the 1-minute push-up and sit-up test was not significantly different between both training groups (p > .05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that performance improvement for the 1-minute push-up and sit-up muscular endurance test are the same for both fast and slow bodyweight resistance training tempo.
author2 -
author_facet -
Ong, Jacky Hou An
format Final Year Project
author Ong, Jacky Hou An
author_sort Ong, Jacky Hou An
title Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
title_short Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
title_full Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
title_fullStr Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
title_full_unstemmed Effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on IPPT's muscular endurance test performance
title_sort effects of slow and fast bodyweight resistance training on ippt's muscular endurance test performance
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153074
_version_ 1718368066225569792