A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools
Due to the modernization of the medical curriculum and technological advancements, anatomy education has evolved beyond cadaveric dissection alone. Plastination techniques, three-dimensional (3D) modeling, and 3D printing technologies have progressively gained importance. However, there are limited...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162295 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-162295 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1622952022-10-12T02:33:16Z A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools Chandrasekaran, Ramya Radzi, Shairah Kai, Peh Zhen Rajalingam, Preman Rotgans, Jerome Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Anatomy Tools Factor Analysis Due to the modernization of the medical curriculum and technological advancements, anatomy education has evolved beyond cadaveric dissection alone. Plastination techniques, three-dimensional (3D) modeling, and 3D printing technologies have progressively gained importance. However, there are limited valid and reliable surveys to evaluate students' perceptions of these new anatomy tools. Hence, this study aimed to develop a validated instrument to measure students' learning satisfaction, self-efficacy, humanistic values, and perceived limitations of plastinated and 3D printed models. A 41-item survey (five-point Likert scale, 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) was administered to Year 1 undergraduate medical students following a randomized controlled crossover study that evaluated plastinated and 3D printed cardiac and neck models. Ninety-six responses were received, and a factor analysis was performed with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy of 0.878. The confirmatory factor analysis yielded a 4-factor, 19 items model that had a good fit with the latent constructs of x 2 (147) = 211.568, P < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.068, root mean square residual = 0.064, comparative fit index = 0.946, and Tucker Lewis index = 0.937. The Cronbach's alpha for the individual factors ranged from 0.74 to 0.95, indicating good internal consistency. This demonstrated a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument to measure students' perceptions toward plastinated and 3D printed models. Ministry of Education (MOE) This research was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education under its Singapore Ministry of Education Tertiary Education Research Fund (MOE2018-TRF-007). 2022-10-12T02:33:16Z 2022-10-12T02:33:16Z 2022 Journal Article Chandrasekaran, R., Radzi, S., Kai, P. Z., Rajalingam, P., Rotgans, J. & Mogali, S. R. (2022). A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(5), 850-862. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2147 1935-9772 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162295 10.1002/ase.2147 34694750 2-s2.0-85122747031 5 15 850 862 en MOE2018-TRF-007 Anatomical Sciences Education © 2021 American Association for Anatomy. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::Medicine Anatomy Tools Factor Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Science::Medicine Anatomy Tools Factor Analysis Chandrasekaran, Ramya Radzi, Shairah Kai, Peh Zhen Rajalingam, Preman Rotgans, Jerome Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
description |
Due to the modernization of the medical curriculum and technological advancements, anatomy education has evolved beyond cadaveric dissection alone. Plastination techniques, three-dimensional (3D) modeling, and 3D printing technologies have progressively gained importance. However, there are limited valid and reliable surveys to evaluate students' perceptions of these new anatomy tools. Hence, this study aimed to develop a validated instrument to measure students' learning satisfaction, self-efficacy, humanistic values, and perceived limitations of plastinated and 3D printed models. A 41-item survey (five-point Likert scale, 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) was administered to Year 1 undergraduate medical students following a randomized controlled crossover study that evaluated plastinated and 3D printed cardiac and neck models. Ninety-six responses were received, and a factor analysis was performed with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy of 0.878. The confirmatory factor analysis yielded a 4-factor, 19 items model that had a good fit with the latent constructs of x 2 (147) = 211.568, P < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.068, root mean square residual = 0.064, comparative fit index = 0.946, and Tucker Lewis index = 0.937. The Cronbach's alpha for the individual factors ranged from 0.74 to 0.95, indicating good internal consistency. This demonstrated a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument to measure students' perceptions toward plastinated and 3D printed models. |
author2 |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) |
author_facet |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Chandrasekaran, Ramya Radzi, Shairah Kai, Peh Zhen Rajalingam, Preman Rotgans, Jerome Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy |
format |
Article |
author |
Chandrasekaran, Ramya Radzi, Shairah Kai, Peh Zhen Rajalingam, Preman Rotgans, Jerome Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy |
author_sort |
Chandrasekaran, Ramya |
title |
A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
title_short |
A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
title_full |
A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
title_fullStr |
A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
title_sort |
validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162295 |
_version_ |
1749179169381548032 |