Does knowledge make a difference? Understanding how the lay public and experts assess the credibility of information on novel foods
Drawing on Metzger's dual-processing model of credibility assessment, this study examines how individuals with varying topical knowledge (laypersons vs experts) assess the credibility of information on novel foods. Online focus group discussions reveal that both groups share similar motivations...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ou, Mengxue, Ho, Shirley S. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174079 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Is this food healthy? The impact of lay beliefs and contextual cues on food healthiness perception and consumption
by: Chan, Elaine, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A question of credibility
by: Gonzales, Andrew
Published: (1990) -
Factors associated with information credibility perceptions: a meta-analysis
by: Ou, Mengxue, et al.
Published: (2024) -
CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT IN MICROBLOGS
by: LIM WEE YONG
Published: (2020) -
Developing a training program for hospital lay ministers in selected parishes in Taipei
by: Chang, Feng-Lien, MSC
Published: (2006)