A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents

The terms leadership and management have often been used interchangeably. Despite certain similarities, both terms have distinctly different origins and specific meanings. In view of this, our study aims to empirically examine the differences and establish them as distinct but related constructs. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lek, Yu Zhen, Chioang, Eugenia Yu Bin, Ang, Michelle Chui Ping
Other Authors: Soh Star
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48304
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-48304
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-483042023-05-19T05:41:37Z A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents Lek, Yu Zhen Chioang, Eugenia Yu Bin Ang, Michelle Chui Ping Soh Star Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Management::Leadership The terms leadership and management have often been used interchangeably. Despite certain similarities, both terms have distinctly different origins and specific meanings. In view of this, our study aims to empirically examine the differences and establish them as distinct but related constructs. In addition, we will examine the practical usage of this by exploring the preference for leadership and managerial roles with personality and values as antecedents. A survey questionnaire to measure leadership and management preferences was developed through a pilot study. Together with established measures of personality traits and values, a web-based survey was administered to NTU students. Results from 582 participants showed that leadership and management are indeed distinct but related: personality traits have a relatively stronger relationship with one’s preference for leadership than management, while values have a relatively stronger relationship with one’s preference for management. Furthermore, the findings also showed that personality traits such as agreeableness, extraversion, and openness to experience, and values of collectivism had the greatest correlation with leadership, while personality traits such as conscientiousness, uncertainty avoidance, and collectivism values correlated higher with management. Limitations and directions for future studies are also discussed, such as conducting the research with working adults, who have more exposure to leadership and managerial experiences. BUSINESS 2012-04-04T07:19:44Z 2012-04-04T07:19:44Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48304 en Nanyang Technological University 49 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::Management::Leadership
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Management::Leadership
Lek, Yu Zhen
Chioang, Eugenia Yu Bin
Ang, Michelle Chui Ping
A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
description The terms leadership and management have often been used interchangeably. Despite certain similarities, both terms have distinctly different origins and specific meanings. In view of this, our study aims to empirically examine the differences and establish them as distinct but related constructs. In addition, we will examine the practical usage of this by exploring the preference for leadership and managerial roles with personality and values as antecedents. A survey questionnaire to measure leadership and management preferences was developed through a pilot study. Together with established measures of personality traits and values, a web-based survey was administered to NTU students. Results from 582 participants showed that leadership and management are indeed distinct but related: personality traits have a relatively stronger relationship with one’s preference for leadership than management, while values have a relatively stronger relationship with one’s preference for management. Furthermore, the findings also showed that personality traits such as agreeableness, extraversion, and openness to experience, and values of collectivism had the greatest correlation with leadership, while personality traits such as conscientiousness, uncertainty avoidance, and collectivism values correlated higher with management. Limitations and directions for future studies are also discussed, such as conducting the research with working adults, who have more exposure to leadership and managerial experiences.
author2 Soh Star
author_facet Soh Star
Lek, Yu Zhen
Chioang, Eugenia Yu Bin
Ang, Michelle Chui Ping
format Final Year Project
author Lek, Yu Zhen
Chioang, Eugenia Yu Bin
Ang, Michelle Chui Ping
author_sort Lek, Yu Zhen
title A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
title_short A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
title_full A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
title_fullStr A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
title_full_unstemmed A study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
title_sort study on the preference for leadership and management with personality traits and values as antecedents
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48304
_version_ 1770564350729256960