Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially

This research examines an element of choice architecture that has received little attention—whether options are presented simultaneously or sequentially. Participants were more likely to choose dominating options when the options were presented simultaneously rather than sequentially, both when the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basu, Shankha, Savani, Krishna
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80703
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42193
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-80703
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-807032023-05-19T06:44:41Z Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially Basu, Shankha Savani, Krishna Nanyang Business School Choice architecture Cognitive load This research examines an element of choice architecture that has received little attention—whether options are presented simultaneously or sequentially. Participants were more likely to choose dominating options when the options were presented simultaneously rather than sequentially, both when the dominance relationship was transparent (Experiment 1) and when it was not (Experiments 2–3). Depth of cognitive processing mediated the effect of option presentation on optimal choice (Experiment 4). Memory load was unlikely to be the underlying mechanism, as individual differences in working memory span did not predict optimal choice in the sequential condition (which places a greater memory load; Experiment 5), and manipulations of memory load did not reduce the benefits of simultaneous presentation (Experiments 6a–6c). Instead, participants’ working memory span predicted optimal choice in the simultaneous condition (which allows for more in-depth processing; Experiment 5), and a manipulation of processing load eliminated the benefits of simultaneous presentation (Experiment 7). MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted Version 2017-03-24T07:11:51Z 2019-12-06T13:55:02Z 2017-03-24T07:11:51Z 2019-12-06T13:55:02Z 2017 2017 Journal Article 72 p. Basu, S., & Savani, K. (2017). Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 76-91. 0749-5978 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80703 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42193 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.004 196387 en Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes © 2017 Elsevier Inc. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier Inc. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.004]. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Choice architecture
Cognitive load
spellingShingle Choice architecture
Cognitive load
Basu, Shankha
Savani, Krishna
Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
description This research examines an element of choice architecture that has received little attention—whether options are presented simultaneously or sequentially. Participants were more likely to choose dominating options when the options were presented simultaneously rather than sequentially, both when the dominance relationship was transparent (Experiment 1) and when it was not (Experiments 2–3). Depth of cognitive processing mediated the effect of option presentation on optimal choice (Experiment 4). Memory load was unlikely to be the underlying mechanism, as individual differences in working memory span did not predict optimal choice in the sequential condition (which places a greater memory load; Experiment 5), and manipulations of memory load did not reduce the benefits of simultaneous presentation (Experiments 6a–6c). Instead, participants’ working memory span predicted optimal choice in the simultaneous condition (which allows for more in-depth processing; Experiment 5), and a manipulation of processing load eliminated the benefits of simultaneous presentation (Experiment 7).
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Basu, Shankha
Savani, Krishna
format Article
author Basu, Shankha
Savani, Krishna
author_sort Basu, Shankha
title Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
title_short Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
title_full Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
title_fullStr Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
title_full_unstemmed Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
title_sort choosing one at a time? presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80703
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42193
_version_ 1770564470118023168