Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors

We compare chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) WSi2WSi2 metal gate process for In0.53Ga0.47AsIn0.53Ga0.47As n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors using 10 and 6.5 nm Al2O3Al2O3 as dielectric layer. The CVD-processed metal gate device with 6.5 nm Al2O3Al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ong, B. S., Pey, Kin Leong, Ong, C. Y., Tan, Chuan Seng, Antoniadis, D. A., Fitzgerald, E. A.
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86528
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44100
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-86528
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-865282020-03-07T13:57:29Z Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors Ong, B. S. Pey, Kin Leong Ong, C. Y. Tan, Chuan Seng Antoniadis, D. A. Fitzgerald, E. A. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Ozone Chemical vapor deposition We compare chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) WSi2WSi2 metal gate process for In0.53Ga0.47AsIn0.53Ga0.47As n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors using 10 and 6.5 nm Al2O3Al2O3 as dielectric layer. The CVD-processed metal gate device with 6.5 nm Al2O3Al2O3 shows enhanced transistor performance such as drive current, maximum transconductance and maximum effective mobility. These values are relatively better than the PVD-processed counterpart device with improvement of 51.8%, 46.4%, and 47.8%, respectively. The improvement for the performance of the CVD-processed metal gate device is due to the fluorine passivation at the oxide/semiconductor interface and a nondestructive deposition process. Published version 2017-12-06T06:08:53Z 2019-12-06T16:24:02Z 2017-12-06T06:08:53Z 2019-12-06T16:24:02Z 2011 Journal Article Ong, B. S., Pey, K. L., Ong, C. Y., Tan, C. S., Antoniadis, D. A., & Fitzgerald, E. A. (2011). Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters, 98(18), 182102-. 0003-6951 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86528 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44100 10.1063/1.3584024 en Applied Physics Letters © 2011 American Institute of Physics (AIP). This paper was published in Applied Physics Letters and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of American Institute of Physics (AIP). The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3584024]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. 3 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Ozone
Chemical vapor deposition
spellingShingle Ozone
Chemical vapor deposition
Ong, B. S.
Pey, Kin Leong
Ong, C. Y.
Tan, Chuan Seng
Antoniadis, D. A.
Fitzgerald, E. A.
Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
description We compare chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) WSi2WSi2 metal gate process for In0.53Ga0.47AsIn0.53Ga0.47As n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors using 10 and 6.5 nm Al2O3Al2O3 as dielectric layer. The CVD-processed metal gate device with 6.5 nm Al2O3Al2O3 shows enhanced transistor performance such as drive current, maximum transconductance and maximum effective mobility. These values are relatively better than the PVD-processed counterpart device with improvement of 51.8%, 46.4%, and 47.8%, respectively. The improvement for the performance of the CVD-processed metal gate device is due to the fluorine passivation at the oxide/semiconductor interface and a nondestructive deposition process.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Ong, B. S.
Pey, Kin Leong
Ong, C. Y.
Tan, Chuan Seng
Antoniadis, D. A.
Fitzgerald, E. A.
format Article
author Ong, B. S.
Pey, Kin Leong
Ong, C. Y.
Tan, Chuan Seng
Antoniadis, D. A.
Fitzgerald, E. A.
author_sort Ong, B. S.
title Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
title_short Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
title_full Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
title_fullStr Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited WSi2 metal gate for InGaAs n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
title_sort comparison between chemical vapor deposited and physical vapor deposited wsi2 metal gate for ingaas n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86528
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44100
_version_ 1681034396686090240