Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study

We present an ab initio study of dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium-doped InGaAs. We consider defect formation energies of various interstitial and substitutional defects and their combinations. We find that all substitutional–substitutional interactions could be neglected. On the other hand, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kulish, Vadym, Liu, Wenyuan, Benistant, Francis, Manzhos, Sergei
Other Authors: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88630
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-88630
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-886302023-02-28T19:35:46Z Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study Kulish, Vadym Liu, Wenyuan Benistant, Francis Manzhos, Sergei School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Semiconducting Diffusion We present an ab initio study of dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium-doped InGaAs. We consider defect formation energies of various interstitial and substitutional defects and their combinations. We find that all substitutional–substitutional interactions could be neglected. On the other hand, interactions involving an interstitial defect are significant. Specially, interstitial Be is stabilized by about 0.9/1.0 eV in the presence of one/two BeGa substitutionals. Ga interstitial is also substantially stabilized by Be substitutionals. Two Be interstitials can form a metastable Be–Be–Ga complex with a dissociation energy of 0.26 eV/Be. Therefore, interstitial defects and defect–defect interactions should be considered in accurate models of Be-doped InGaAs. We suggest that In and Ga should be treated as separate atoms and not lumped into a single effective group III element, as has been done before. We identified dopant-centred states which indicate the presence of other charge states at finite temperatures, specifically, the presence of Beint +1 (as opposed to Beint +2 at 0 K). MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2018-04-11T09:28:13Z 2019-12-06T17:07:40Z 2018-04-11T09:28:13Z 2019-12-06T17:07:40Z 2018 Journal Article Kulish, V., Liu, W., Benistant, F., & Manzhos, S. (2018). Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study. Journal of Materials Research, 33(4), 401-413. 0884-2914 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88630 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44673 10.1557/jmr.2017.474 en Journal of Materials Research © 2018. Materials Research Society. This paper was published in Journal of Materials Research and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of Materials Research Society. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.474]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. 13 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Semiconducting
Diffusion
spellingShingle Semiconducting
Diffusion
Kulish, Vadym
Liu, Wenyuan
Benistant, Francis
Manzhos, Sergei
Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
description We present an ab initio study of dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium-doped InGaAs. We consider defect formation energies of various interstitial and substitutional defects and their combinations. We find that all substitutional–substitutional interactions could be neglected. On the other hand, interactions involving an interstitial defect are significant. Specially, interstitial Be is stabilized by about 0.9/1.0 eV in the presence of one/two BeGa substitutionals. Ga interstitial is also substantially stabilized by Be substitutionals. Two Be interstitials can form a metastable Be–Be–Ga complex with a dissociation energy of 0.26 eV/Be. Therefore, interstitial defects and defect–defect interactions should be considered in accurate models of Be-doped InGaAs. We suggest that In and Ga should be treated as separate atoms and not lumped into a single effective group III element, as has been done before. We identified dopant-centred states which indicate the presence of other charge states at finite temperatures, specifically, the presence of Beint +1 (as opposed to Beint +2 at 0 K).
author2 School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
author_facet School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Kulish, Vadym
Liu, Wenyuan
Benistant, Francis
Manzhos, Sergei
format Article
author Kulish, Vadym
Liu, Wenyuan
Benistant, Francis
Manzhos, Sergei
author_sort Kulish, Vadym
title Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
title_short Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
title_full Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
title_fullStr Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
title_full_unstemmed Dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: An ab initio study
title_sort dopant–dopant interactions in beryllium doped indium gallium arsenide: an ab initio study
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88630
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44673
_version_ 1759857567972982784