Negotiating by the Rules: When Emotional Labor Dictates Emotional Expression in Negotiation

Participants completed a 20-minute work-related, multi-issue negotiation (Confetti, O'Connor, 1997) in same-sex dyads. Extending negotiation-emotion research (e.g., Barry, 1999), emotional labor (ref. Grandey, 2000) rules were manipulated within the negotiation directions; participants were enc...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: PADDOCK, Elizabeth Layne, Judge, Timothy A.
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2006
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1309
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:Participants completed a 20-minute work-related, multi-issue negotiation (Confetti, O'Connor, 1997) in same-sex dyads. Extending negotiation-emotion research (e.g., Barry, 1999), emotional labor (ref. Grandey, 2000) rules were manipulated within the negotiation directions; participants were encouraged to suppress emotions except those expressed and express anger, neutrality, or happiness. Results for attitudinal and behavioral outcomes show three-way interactions among emotional labor rule, negotiator role (manager, employee), and gender. For example, female "managers" achieved more positive outcomes when displaying neutrality than happiness or anger. Men showed the opposite pattern. Emotion regulation techniques (surface acting, deep acting) and experienced emotional intensity also differed across conditions.