What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research

Given the practical importance of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the study of determinants of trust in negotiations. However, research in this area has not been well connected or integrated, which limits the ability of scholars and pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LU, Serena Changhong, KONG, Dejun Tony, FERRIN, Donald Lee, DIRKS, Kurt T.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5295
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6294/viewcontent/DeterminantsInterpersonalTrustDyadicNegotiations_2017.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6294
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-62942018-09-14T08:40:41Z What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research LU, Serena Changhong KONG, Dejun Tony FERRIN, Donald Lee DIRKS, Kurt T. Given the practical importance of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the study of determinants of trust in negotiations. However, research in this area has not been well connected or integrated, which limits the ability of scholars and practitioners to ascertain the state of current scientific knowledge and identify questions for future research. Based on attribution theory and social exchange theory, we present a conceptual framework for understanding how a variety of factors combine to influence the development of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations. Then, to verify the conceptual framework, we identified and meta-analysed findings from a total of 25 independent studies of determinants of trust in negotiations. The meta-analyses provided support for two of the three factors in the conceptual framework – trustor attributes and shared attributes – that are likely to influence an individual’s trust in a negotiation partner. The framework and findings provide valuable scientific insights on trust and negotiation, and also valuable practical insights for negotiation practitioners. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5295 info:doi/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6294/viewcontent/DeterminantsInterpersonalTrustDyadicNegotiations_2017.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Trust negotiation behaviour affect relationship meta-analysis Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Trust
negotiation
behaviour
affect
relationship
meta-analysis
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Trust
negotiation
behaviour
affect
relationship
meta-analysis
Organizational Behavior and Theory
LU, Serena Changhong
KONG, Dejun Tony
FERRIN, Donald Lee
DIRKS, Kurt T.
What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
description Given the practical importance of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the study of determinants of trust in negotiations. However, research in this area has not been well connected or integrated, which limits the ability of scholars and practitioners to ascertain the state of current scientific knowledge and identify questions for future research. Based on attribution theory and social exchange theory, we present a conceptual framework for understanding how a variety of factors combine to influence the development of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations. Then, to verify the conceptual framework, we identified and meta-analysed findings from a total of 25 independent studies of determinants of trust in negotiations. The meta-analyses provided support for two of the three factors in the conceptual framework – trustor attributes and shared attributes – that are likely to influence an individual’s trust in a negotiation partner. The framework and findings provide valuable scientific insights on trust and negotiation, and also valuable practical insights for negotiation practitioners.
format text
author LU, Serena Changhong
KONG, Dejun Tony
FERRIN, Donald Lee
DIRKS, Kurt T.
author_facet LU, Serena Changhong
KONG, Dejun Tony
FERRIN, Donald Lee
DIRKS, Kurt T.
author_sort LU, Serena Changhong
title What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
title_short What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
title_full What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
title_fullStr What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
title_full_unstemmed What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
title_sort what are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5295
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6294/viewcontent/DeterminantsInterpersonalTrustDyadicNegotiations_2017.pdf
_version_ 1770573724224847872