To give or not to give? Choosing chance under moral conflict
Although prior research suggests that people should not prefer random chance to determine their outcomes, we propose that in the context of prosocial requests, a contingent of people prefer to rely on chance. We argue that this is because they are conflicted between losing resources (e.g., time, mon...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | LIN, Stephanie C., REICH, Taly |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5404 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6403/viewcontent/Lin_et_al_2017_Journal_of_Consumer_Psychology__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Sidestepping the rock and the hard place: The private avoidance of prosocial requests
by: LIN, Stephanie C., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Moral traps: When self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior
by: LIN, Stephanie C., et al.
Published: (2017) -
EFFECTS OF GRATITUDE ON PROSOCIAL INTENTIONS AND ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
by: GOH KIAN CHYE, KENNY
Published: (2022) -
Rules or Consequences? The Role of Ethical Mind-Sets in Moral Dynamics
by: Cornelisson, Gert, et al.
Published: (2013) -
EMOTIONS AS HEURISTICS: A DUAL APPROACH MODEL TO MORAL DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK
by: GOH GABRIEL
Published: (2019)