Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings

Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings

The authors reanalyzed assessment center (AC) multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices containing correlations among postexercise dimension ratings (PEDRs) reported by F. Lievens and J. M. Conway (2001). Unlike F. Lievens and J. M. Conway, who used a correlated dimension-correlated uniqueness model, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LANCE, Charles E., LAMBERT, Tracy A., GEWIN, Amanda G., LIEVENS, Filip, CONWAY, James M.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2004
Subjects:
Analysis of Variance
Factor Analysis
Statistical
Humans
Models
Personnel Selection
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Human Resources Management
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5610
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6609/viewcontent/lance.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:The authors reanalyzed assessment center (AC) multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices containing correlations among postexercise dimension ratings (PEDRs) reported by F. Lievens and J. M. Conway (2001). Unlike F. Lievens and J. M. Conway, who used a correlated dimension-correlated uniqueness model, we used a different set of confirmatory-factor-analysis-based models (1-dimension-correlated Exercise and 1-dimension-correlated uniqueness models) to estimate dimension and exercise variance components in AC PEDRs. Results of reanalyses suggest that, consistent with previous narrative reviews, exercise variance components dominate over dimension variance components after all. Implications for AC construct validity and possible redirections of research on the validity of ACs are discussed.

Similar Items