Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs

Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ROCKSTUHL, Thomas, ANG, Soon, NG, Kok-Yee, LIEVENS, Filip, Linn, Van Dyne
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6706
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-67062018-03-14T03:00:19Z Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs ROCKSTUHL, Thomas ANG, Soon NG, Kok-Yee LIEVENS, Filip Linn, Van Dyne Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional SJT paradigm and propose that adding explicit assessments of situational judgment to SJTs will provide incremental information beyond that provided by response judgment. We test this hypothesis across 4 studies using intercultural multimedia SJTs. Study 1 uses verbal protocol analysis to discover the situational judgments people make when responding to SJT items. Study 2 shows situational judgment predicts time-lagged, peer-rated task performance and interpersonal citizenship among undergraduate seniors over and above response judgment and other established predictors. Study 3 shows providing situational judgment did not affect the predictive validity of response judgment. Study 4 replicates Study 2 in a working adult sample. We discuss implications for SJT theory as well as the practical implications of putting judging situations back into SJTs. 2015-03-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707 info:doi/10.1037/a0038098 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Situational judgment test intercultural skills performance verbal protocol analysis Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Situational judgment test
intercultural skills
performance
verbal protocol analysis
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Situational judgment test
intercultural skills
performance
verbal protocol analysis
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
ROCKSTUHL, Thomas
ANG, Soon
NG, Kok-Yee
LIEVENS, Filip
Linn, Van Dyne
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
description Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional SJT paradigm and propose that adding explicit assessments of situational judgment to SJTs will provide incremental information beyond that provided by response judgment. We test this hypothesis across 4 studies using intercultural multimedia SJTs. Study 1 uses verbal protocol analysis to discover the situational judgments people make when responding to SJT items. Study 2 shows situational judgment predicts time-lagged, peer-rated task performance and interpersonal citizenship among undergraduate seniors over and above response judgment and other established predictors. Study 3 shows providing situational judgment did not affect the predictive validity of response judgment. Study 4 replicates Study 2 in a working adult sample. We discuss implications for SJT theory as well as the practical implications of putting judging situations back into SJTs.
format text
author ROCKSTUHL, Thomas
ANG, Soon
NG, Kok-Yee
LIEVENS, Filip
Linn, Van Dyne
author_facet ROCKSTUHL, Thomas
ANG, Soon
NG, Kok-Yee
LIEVENS, Filip
Linn, Van Dyne
author_sort ROCKSTUHL, Thomas
title Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
title_short Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
title_full Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
title_fullStr Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
title_full_unstemmed Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
title_sort putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: evidence from intercultural multimedia sjts
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707
_version_ 1770574055970177024