Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs
Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6706 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-67062018-03-14T03:00:19Z Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs ROCKSTUHL, Thomas ANG, Soon NG, Kok-Yee LIEVENS, Filip Linn, Van Dyne Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional SJT paradigm and propose that adding explicit assessments of situational judgment to SJTs will provide incremental information beyond that provided by response judgment. We test this hypothesis across 4 studies using intercultural multimedia SJTs. Study 1 uses verbal protocol analysis to discover the situational judgments people make when responding to SJT items. Study 2 shows situational judgment predicts time-lagged, peer-rated task performance and interpersonal citizenship among undergraduate seniors over and above response judgment and other established predictors. Study 3 shows providing situational judgment did not affect the predictive validity of response judgment. Study 4 replicates Study 2 in a working adult sample. We discuss implications for SJT theory as well as the practical implications of putting judging situations back into SJTs. 2015-03-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707 info:doi/10.1037/a0038098 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Situational judgment test intercultural skills performance verbal protocol analysis Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Situational judgment test intercultural skills performance verbal protocol analysis Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Situational judgment test intercultural skills performance verbal protocol analysis Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory ROCKSTUHL, Thomas ANG, Soon NG, Kok-Yee LIEVENS, Filip Linn, Van Dyne Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
description |
Although the term situational judgment test (SJT) implies judging situations, existing SJTs focus more on judging the effectiveness of different response options (i.e., response judgment) and less on how people perceive and interpret situations (i.e., situational judgment). We expand the traditional SJT paradigm and propose that adding explicit assessments of situational judgment to SJTs will provide incremental information beyond that provided by response judgment. We test this hypothesis across 4 studies using intercultural multimedia SJTs. Study 1 uses verbal protocol analysis to discover the situational judgments people make when responding to SJT items. Study 2 shows situational judgment predicts time-lagged, peer-rated task performance and interpersonal citizenship among undergraduate seniors over and above response judgment and other established predictors. Study 3 shows providing situational judgment did not affect the predictive validity of response judgment. Study 4 replicates Study 2 in a working adult sample. We discuss implications for SJT theory as well as the practical implications of putting judging situations back into SJTs. |
format |
text |
author |
ROCKSTUHL, Thomas ANG, Soon NG, Kok-Yee LIEVENS, Filip Linn, Van Dyne |
author_facet |
ROCKSTUHL, Thomas ANG, Soon NG, Kok-Yee LIEVENS, Filip Linn, Van Dyne |
author_sort |
ROCKSTUHL, Thomas |
title |
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
title_short |
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
title_full |
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
title_fullStr |
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs |
title_sort |
putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: evidence from intercultural multimedia sjts |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5707 |
_version_ |
1770574055970177024 |