Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum

In a crisis, an information vacuum is immediately generated in the media (Coombs, 2012; Heath, 2006). Information vacuum (Kauffman, 2005, p. 266), also known as “information void” (Coombs, 2012, p. 141) or “reporting vacuum” (Heath, 2006, p. 247), is created by the crisis and as a result of the cris...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: PANG, A.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6075
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7074
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-70742019-02-07T09:42:08Z Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum PANG, A. In a crisis, an information vacuum is immediately generated in the media (Coombs, 2012; Heath, 2006). Information vacuum (Kauffman, 2005, p. 266), also known as “information void” (Coombs, 2012, p. 141) or “reporting vacuum” (Heath, 2006, p. 247), is created by the crisis and as a result of the crisis: people want to know what happens when bad things happen. This insatiable thirst for information is driven not just by primary stakeholders – more critically, it is driven by media demand for “immediate information and answers during a crisis” (Marra, 2004, p. 311). It becomes a vicious cycle: the media are hot at the heels of the news, and stakeholders regard the media as their “primary” source of information (Coombs, 2012, p. 141), which in turn fuels the media to meet this demand. Little wonder that Garnett and Kouzmin (2007) described crises as “media events” (p. 175).Crisis scholars have alluded to the need to fill this vacuum. Otherwise, the vacuum would be consumed by less credible, accurate, and useful information to the detriment of the organization (Coombs, 2012). Marra (2004), citing a practitioner, captured it best: “In the absence of information, misinformation becomes news” (p. 312). Given the driving role that both the traditional and social media play in the vacuum, and the criticality of filling it, little is elaborated on how the vacuum works and how it affects the organization. 2013-08-30T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6075 info:doi/10.4337/9781781006405.00020 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
PANG, A.
Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
description In a crisis, an information vacuum is immediately generated in the media (Coombs, 2012; Heath, 2006). Information vacuum (Kauffman, 2005, p. 266), also known as “information void” (Coombs, 2012, p. 141) or “reporting vacuum” (Heath, 2006, p. 247), is created by the crisis and as a result of the crisis: people want to know what happens when bad things happen. This insatiable thirst for information is driven not just by primary stakeholders – more critically, it is driven by media demand for “immediate information and answers during a crisis” (Marra, 2004, p. 311). It becomes a vicious cycle: the media are hot at the heels of the news, and stakeholders regard the media as their “primary” source of information (Coombs, 2012, p. 141), which in turn fuels the media to meet this demand. Little wonder that Garnett and Kouzmin (2007) described crises as “media events” (p. 175).Crisis scholars have alluded to the need to fill this vacuum. Otherwise, the vacuum would be consumed by less credible, accurate, and useful information to the detriment of the organization (Coombs, 2012). Marra (2004), citing a practitioner, captured it best: “In the absence of information, misinformation becomes news” (p. 312). Given the driving role that both the traditional and social media play in the vacuum, and the criticality of filling it, little is elaborated on how the vacuum works and how it affects the organization.
format text
author PANG, A.
author_facet PANG, A.
author_sort PANG, A.
title Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
title_short Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
title_full Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
title_fullStr Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
title_full_unstemmed Dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: Managing the information vacuum
title_sort dealing with external stakeholders during the crisis: managing the information vacuum
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2013
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6075
_version_ 1770574544359129088