Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication
Despite the advances made offering a viable perspective in strategic conflict management, the contingency theory has not addressed a prevailing question: How can the theory inform organizations to communicate ethically with its publics, especially during crisis? The only guidance the theory offers i...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6095 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7094/viewcontent/27a53c_329a20c6c15d40f692a559eb60897ffd.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7094 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-70942019-07-19T02:25:07Z Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication PANG, Augustine JIN, Yan CAMERON, Glen T. Despite the advances made offering a viable perspective in strategic conflict management, the contingency theory has not addressed a prevailing question: How can the theory inform organizations to communicate ethically with its publics, especially during crisis? The only guidance the theory offers is through its proscriptive variables, which prohibit either communication or more accommodative communication. However, given the exigency and dynamism of many situations along the life cycle of an issue, non-communicating may not be an alternative offered to organizations. This study aims to unearth a new set of factors called ethical variables that influence the organization’s stance by reviewing corporate social responsibility and conflict communication literature to propose drivers that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication. Responsibility is ethics manifested (Joyner & Payne, 2002). Six factors, some not addressed by the theory, were found, namely the role of public relations practitioners; role of dominant coalition; exposure of organizational business and to diversity of cultures; government influence and intervention; nature of crisis; and activism. Though the study is exploratory, it represents a major theoretical breakthrough in theory building with the aim of offering a practical approach – rather than a philosophical argument and persuasion – for practitioners to begin engaging in ethical elocation. 2010-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6095 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7094/viewcontent/27a53c_329a20c6c15d40f692a559eb60897ffd.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business and Corporate Communications Organizational Communication |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Business and Corporate Communications Organizational Communication |
spellingShingle |
Business and Corporate Communications Organizational Communication PANG, Augustine JIN, Yan CAMERON, Glen T. Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
description |
Despite the advances made offering a viable perspective in strategic conflict management, the contingency theory has not addressed a prevailing question: How can the theory inform organizations to communicate ethically with its publics, especially during crisis? The only guidance the theory offers is through its proscriptive variables, which prohibit either communication or more accommodative communication. However, given the exigency and dynamism of many situations along the life cycle of an issue, non-communicating may not be an alternative offered to organizations. This study aims to unearth a new set of factors called ethical variables that influence the organization’s stance by reviewing corporate social responsibility and conflict communication literature to propose drivers that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication. Responsibility is ethics manifested (Joyner & Payne, 2002). Six factors, some not addressed by the theory, were found, namely the role of public relations practitioners; role of dominant coalition; exposure of organizational business and to diversity of cultures; government influence and intervention; nature of crisis; and activism. Though the study is exploratory, it represents a major theoretical breakthrough in theory building with the aim of offering a practical approach – rather than a philosophical argument and persuasion – for practitioners to begin engaging in ethical elocation. |
format |
text |
author |
PANG, Augustine JIN, Yan CAMERON, Glen T. |
author_facet |
PANG, Augustine JIN, Yan CAMERON, Glen T. |
author_sort |
PANG, Augustine |
title |
Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
title_short |
Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
title_full |
Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
title_fullStr |
Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
title_sort |
contingency theory of strategic conflict management: unearthing factors that influence ethical elocution in crisis communication |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6095 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7094/viewcontent/27a53c_329a20c6c15d40f692a559eb60897ffd.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574587238547456 |