Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment

We compare the efficacy of two broad approaches to entrepreneurship training: a training prioritizing demand-side activities versus a training prioritizing resource-side activities. We do so by running a field experiment inside a 6-month entrepreneurship program involving 236 early-stage entrepreneu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SANTAMARIA, Simone, ABOLFATHI, Niloofar, MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7337
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8336/viewcontent/Demand_pull_versus_resource_push_training_approaches_to_entrepreneurship_pvoa_cc_nc.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8336
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-83362024-05-27T01:45:30Z Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment SANTAMARIA, Simone ABOLFATHI, Niloofar MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha We compare the efficacy of two broad approaches to entrepreneurship training: a training prioritizing demand-side activities versus a training prioritizing resource-side activities. We do so by running a field experiment inside a 6-month entrepreneurship program involving 236 early-stage entrepreneurs. Inspired by our training, the first group invested more time interacting with potential customers and developing a deep understanding of customer needs and problems. The other group, in contrast, spent more time identifying and exploiting their core resources such as their network. Our results reveal that the training prioritizing demand-side activities is substantially more effective. At the end of the program, the group exposed to the demand-side training acquired more than twice the number of customers and generated revenues 65% higher than the other group. 2024-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7337 info:doi/10.1002/smj.3560 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8336/viewcontent/Demand_pull_versus_resource_push_training_approaches_to_entrepreneurship_pvoa_cc_nc.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University demand-side perspective early-stage entrepreneurs entrepreneurship training field experiment resource based view Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic demand-side perspective
early-stage entrepreneurs
entrepreneurship training
field experiment
resource based view
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle demand-side perspective
early-stage entrepreneurs
entrepreneurship training
field experiment
resource based view
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
SANTAMARIA, Simone
ABOLFATHI, Niloofar
MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha
Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
description We compare the efficacy of two broad approaches to entrepreneurship training: a training prioritizing demand-side activities versus a training prioritizing resource-side activities. We do so by running a field experiment inside a 6-month entrepreneurship program involving 236 early-stage entrepreneurs. Inspired by our training, the first group invested more time interacting with potential customers and developing a deep understanding of customer needs and problems. The other group, in contrast, spent more time identifying and exploiting their core resources such as their network. Our results reveal that the training prioritizing demand-side activities is substantially more effective. At the end of the program, the group exposed to the demand-side training acquired more than twice the number of customers and generated revenues 65% higher than the other group.
format text
author SANTAMARIA, Simone
ABOLFATHI, Niloofar
MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha
author_facet SANTAMARIA, Simone
ABOLFATHI, Niloofar
MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha
author_sort SANTAMARIA, Simone
title Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
title_short Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
title_full Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
title_fullStr Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
title_full_unstemmed Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment
title_sort demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: a field experiment
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2024
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7337
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8336/viewcontent/Demand_pull_versus_resource_push_training_approaches_to_entrepreneurship_pvoa_cc_nc.pdf
_version_ 1814047515147763712