Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems

The emerging trend of social information processing has resulted in Web users’ increased reliance on user-generated content contributed by others for information searching and decision making. Rating scores, a form of user-generated content contributed by reviewers in online rating systems, allow us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LAUW, Hady W., LIM, Ee Peng, WANG, Ke
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1518
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/2517/viewcontent/tweb12.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-2517
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-25172018-06-21T05:19:46Z Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems LAUW, Hady W. LIM, Ee Peng WANG, Ke The emerging trend of social information processing has resulted in Web users’ increased reliance on user-generated content contributed by others for information searching and decision making. Rating scores, a form of user-generated content contributed by reviewers in online rating systems, allow users to leverage others’ opinions in the evaluation of objects. In this article, we focus on the problem of summarizing the rating scores given to an object into an overall score that reflects the object’s quality. We observe that the existing approaches for summarizing scores largely ignores the effect of reviewers exercising different standards in assigning scores. Instead of treating all reviewers as equals, our approach models the leniency of reviewers, which refers to the tendency of a reviewer to assign higher scores than other coreviewers. Our approach is underlined by two insights: (1) The leniency of a reviewer depends not only on how the reviewer rates objects, but also on how other reviewers rate those objects and (2) The leniency of a reviewer and the quality of rated objects are mutually dependent. We develop the leniency-aware quality, or LQ model, which solves leniency and quality simultaneously. We introduce both an exact and a ranked solution to the model. Experiments on real-life and synthetic datasets show that LQ is more effective than comparable approaches. LQ is also shown to perform consistently better under different parameter settings. 2012-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1518 info:doi/10.1145/2109205.2109209 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/2517/viewcontent/tweb12.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Rating Social network mining Leniency Quality Link analysis Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Rating
Social network mining
Leniency
Quality
Link analysis
Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
spellingShingle Rating
Social network mining
Leniency
Quality
Link analysis
Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
LAUW, Hady W.
LIM, Ee Peng
WANG, Ke
Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
description The emerging trend of social information processing has resulted in Web users’ increased reliance on user-generated content contributed by others for information searching and decision making. Rating scores, a form of user-generated content contributed by reviewers in online rating systems, allow users to leverage others’ opinions in the evaluation of objects. In this article, we focus on the problem of summarizing the rating scores given to an object into an overall score that reflects the object’s quality. We observe that the existing approaches for summarizing scores largely ignores the effect of reviewers exercising different standards in assigning scores. Instead of treating all reviewers as equals, our approach models the leniency of reviewers, which refers to the tendency of a reviewer to assign higher scores than other coreviewers. Our approach is underlined by two insights: (1) The leniency of a reviewer depends not only on how the reviewer rates objects, but also on how other reviewers rate those objects and (2) The leniency of a reviewer and the quality of rated objects are mutually dependent. We develop the leniency-aware quality, or LQ model, which solves leniency and quality simultaneously. We introduce both an exact and a ranked solution to the model. Experiments on real-life and synthetic datasets show that LQ is more effective than comparable approaches. LQ is also shown to perform consistently better under different parameter settings.
format text
author LAUW, Hady W.
LIM, Ee Peng
WANG, Ke
author_facet LAUW, Hady W.
LIM, Ee Peng
WANG, Ke
author_sort LAUW, Hady W.
title Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
title_short Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
title_full Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
title_fullStr Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
title_full_unstemmed Quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
title_sort quality and leniency in online collaborative rating systems
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1518
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/2517/viewcontent/tweb12.pdf
_version_ 1770571216302637056