Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments

Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming more popular. The NI of a new treatment compared with a standard treatment is established when the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the standard treatment. A valid NI trial is also required to show assay sensitivity, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KWONG, Koon Shing, CHEUNG, Siu Hung, HAYTER, Anthony J.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1494
https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213477767
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2493
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-24932018-09-10T07:31:04Z Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments KWONG, Koon Shing CHEUNG, Siu Hung HAYTER, Anthony J. Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming more popular. The NI of a new treatment compared with a standard treatment is established when the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the standard treatment. A valid NI trial is also required to show assay sensitivity, the demonstration of the standard treatment having the expected effect with a size comparable to those reported in previous placebo-controlled studies. A three-arm NI trial is a clinical study that includes a new treatment, a standard treatment and a placebo. Most of the statistical methods developed for three-arm NI trials are designed for the existence of only one new treatment. Recently, a single-step procedure was developed to deal with NI trials with multiple new treatments with the overall familywise error rate controlled at a specified level. In this article, we extend the single-step procedure to two new step-up procedures for NI trials with multiple new treatments. A comparative study of test power shows that both proposed step-up procedures provide a significant improvement of power when compared to the single-step procedure. One of the two proposed step-up procedures also allows the flexibility of allocating different error rates between the sensitivity hypothesis and the NI hypotheses so that the assignment of fewer patients to the placebo becomes possible when designing NI trials. We illustrate the new procedures using data from a clinical trial. 2016-08-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1494 info:doi/10.1177/0962280213477767 https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213477767 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University assay sensitivity control treatment Familywise error rate non-inferiority trial placebo stepwise procedure Econometrics Health Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic assay sensitivity
control treatment
Familywise error rate
non-inferiority trial
placebo
stepwise procedure
Econometrics
Health Economics
spellingShingle assay sensitivity
control treatment
Familywise error rate
non-inferiority trial
placebo
stepwise procedure
Econometrics
Health Economics
KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
description Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming more popular. The NI of a new treatment compared with a standard treatment is established when the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the standard treatment. A valid NI trial is also required to show assay sensitivity, the demonstration of the standard treatment having the expected effect with a size comparable to those reported in previous placebo-controlled studies. A three-arm NI trial is a clinical study that includes a new treatment, a standard treatment and a placebo. Most of the statistical methods developed for three-arm NI trials are designed for the existence of only one new treatment. Recently, a single-step procedure was developed to deal with NI trials with multiple new treatments with the overall familywise error rate controlled at a specified level. In this article, we extend the single-step procedure to two new step-up procedures for NI trials with multiple new treatments. A comparative study of test power shows that both proposed step-up procedures provide a significant improvement of power when compared to the single-step procedure. One of the two proposed step-up procedures also allows the flexibility of allocating different error rates between the sensitivity hypothesis and the NI hypotheses so that the assignment of fewer patients to the placebo becomes possible when designing NI trials. We illustrate the new procedures using data from a clinical trial.
format text
author KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
author_facet KWONG, Koon Shing
CHEUNG, Siu Hung
HAYTER, Anthony J.
author_sort KWONG, Koon Shing
title Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
title_short Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
title_full Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
title_fullStr Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
title_full_unstemmed Step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
title_sort step-up procedures for non-inferiority tests with multiple experimental treatments
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2016
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1494
https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213477767
_version_ 1770571535017312256