The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective
The purpose of this article is to examine the suitability rules regarding structured products under Taiwan law from a comparative law perspective. After the global financial crisis, Taiwan has imposed specific suitability obligations on financial institutions when they promote derivatives and struct...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | Chinese |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1033 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832126 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | Chinese |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-2985 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-29852011-06-06T03:06:13Z The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective CHEN, Christopher Chao-hung The purpose of this article is to examine the suitability rules regarding structured products under Taiwan law from a comparative law perspective. After the global financial crisis, Taiwan has imposed specific suitability obligations on financial institutions when they promote derivatives and structured products. However, the suitability rule is only placed in administrative regulations and its scope is also limited. In addition, Taiwan law does not distinguish different types of relationships between a financial institution and a client. Furthermore, the biggest challenge to the suitability rule is to define the meaning of ‘suitable’. This article argues that the starting point is the analysis of risk suitability. However, the analysis of return aspect should not be ignored. As to product due diligence, regulators must further venture into the review of documentation and offer more detailed guidelines to financial institutions in order to serve the purpose of the suitability rule and create an efficient mechanism for investor protection. 2011-04-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1033 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832126 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law chi Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Suitability appropriateness conduct of business comparative law investment advice structured notes derivatives structured products Asian Studies Banking and Finance Law Commercial Law Comparative and Foreign Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
Chinese |
topic |
Suitability appropriateness conduct of business comparative law investment advice structured notes derivatives structured products Asian Studies Banking and Finance Law Commercial Law Comparative and Foreign Law |
spellingShingle |
Suitability appropriateness conduct of business comparative law investment advice structured notes derivatives structured products Asian Studies Banking and Finance Law Commercial Law Comparative and Foreign Law CHEN, Christopher Chao-hung The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
description |
The purpose of this article is to examine the suitability rules regarding structured products under Taiwan law from a comparative law perspective. After the global financial crisis, Taiwan has imposed specific suitability obligations on financial institutions when they promote derivatives and structured products. However, the suitability rule is only placed in administrative regulations and its scope is also limited. In addition, Taiwan law does not distinguish different types of relationships between a financial institution and a client. Furthermore, the biggest challenge to the suitability rule is to define the meaning of ‘suitable’. This article argues that the starting point is the analysis of risk suitability. However, the analysis of return aspect should not be ignored. As to product due diligence, regulators must further venture into the review of documentation and offer more detailed guidelines to financial institutions in order to serve the purpose of the suitability rule and create an efficient mechanism for investor protection. |
format |
text |
author |
CHEN, Christopher Chao-hung |
author_facet |
CHEN, Christopher Chao-hung |
author_sort |
CHEN, Christopher Chao-hung |
title |
The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
title_short |
The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
title_full |
The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
title_fullStr |
The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions when Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
title_sort |
construction of suitability obligation of financial institutions when selling structured products: from comparative law perspective |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1033 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832126 |
_version_ |
1772829695977455616 |