Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing

We investigated bilingual advantages in general control abilities using three complex-span tasks of working memory (WM). An operation-span task served as a baseline measure of WM capacity. Additionally, two modified versions of the Stroop-span task were designed to place varying attentional-control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YANG, Hwajin, YANG, Sujin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2057
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3314/viewcontent/Bilingual_advantages_WM_2016_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3314
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-33142020-03-31T06:11:00Z Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing YANG, Hwajin YANG, Sujin We investigated bilingual advantages in general control abilities using three complex-span tasks of working memory (WM). An operation-span task served as a baseline measure of WM capacity. Additionally, two modified versions of the Stroop-span task were designed to place varying attentional-control demands during memoranda encoding by asking participants either to read the to-be-remembered item aloud (lower cognitive control; i.e., Stroop-span task) or to name the font color of the to-be-remembered item while still encoding the word for later recall (greater cognitive control; i.e., attention-impeded Stroop-span task). Twenty-six Korean-English bilinguals and 25 English-native monolinguals were tested. We found that bilinguals outperformed monolinguals on the attention-impeded Stroop-span task, but on neither the operation-span nor the Stroop-span task. Our findings demonstrate that bilingualism provides advantages in controlled processing, an important component of WM and other executive functions, suggesting that the demand for controlled processing in WM tasks moderates bilingual effects on WM. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2057 info:doi/10.1017/S1366728915000632 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3314/viewcontent/Bilingual_advantages_WM_2016_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University bilingualism controlled attention executive attention interference working memory Cognitive Psychology Multicultural Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic bilingualism
controlled attention
executive attention
interference
working memory
Cognitive Psychology
Multicultural Psychology
spellingShingle bilingualism
controlled attention
executive attention
interference
working memory
Cognitive Psychology
Multicultural Psychology
YANG, Hwajin
YANG, Sujin
Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
description We investigated bilingual advantages in general control abilities using three complex-span tasks of working memory (WM). An operation-span task served as a baseline measure of WM capacity. Additionally, two modified versions of the Stroop-span task were designed to place varying attentional-control demands during memoranda encoding by asking participants either to read the to-be-remembered item aloud (lower cognitive control; i.e., Stroop-span task) or to name the font color of the to-be-remembered item while still encoding the word for later recall (greater cognitive control; i.e., attention-impeded Stroop-span task). Twenty-six Korean-English bilinguals and 25 English-native monolinguals were tested. We found that bilinguals outperformed monolinguals on the attention-impeded Stroop-span task, but on neither the operation-span nor the Stroop-span task. Our findings demonstrate that bilingualism provides advantages in controlled processing, an important component of WM and other executive functions, suggesting that the demand for controlled processing in WM tasks moderates bilingual effects on WM.
format text
author YANG, Hwajin
YANG, Sujin
author_facet YANG, Hwajin
YANG, Sujin
author_sort YANG, Hwajin
title Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
title_short Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
title_full Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
title_fullStr Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
title_full_unstemmed Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
title_sort are all interferences bad? bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2057
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3314/viewcontent/Bilingual_advantages_WM_2016_afv.pdf
_version_ 1770573217282392064