Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application

The disturbance storm time (Dst) index is used for predicting the geomagnetic storm that can affect many systems on earth. The application of the dual unscented Kalman filter (DUKF) to improve the quality of the D st index prediction by simultaneously estimating the process noise covariance is set f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boonsri Kaewkham-ai, Kasemsak Uthaichana
Format: Conference Proceeding
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952374066&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50698
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-50698
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-506982018-09-04T04:45:27Z Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application Boonsri Kaewkham-ai Kasemsak Uthaichana Computer Science Engineering The disturbance storm time (Dst) index is used for predicting the geomagnetic storm that can affect many systems on earth. The application of the dual unscented Kalman filter (DUKF) to improve the quality of the D st index prediction by simultaneously estimating the process noise covariance is set forth in this paper. In DUKF, two unscented Kalman filters (UKFs) are run in parallel. The UKF applied to a model-based Dst index prediction is so called a state estimator; while the other, a parameter estimator, is for identifying and recursively updating the process noise covariance. The performance comparison between the traditional UKF with fixed constant values of the process noise covariance, and the DUKF are examined. The actual all Dst and the Dst data during the storm (below -80 nT) are used to assess the quality of the predictions. It is found that root mean square error (RMSE) of Dst index prediction using the DUKF is lower than that of the UKF with fixed constant process noise covariances. Specifically, RMSEs of the DUKF are 6.5816 for all Dst and 18.0615 for Dst below -80 nT, whereas, the prediction using a fixed constant process noise covariance yield RMSEs of at least 6.6678 and 19.3954 for all Dst and Dst below -80 nT, respectively. Hence, the DUKF outperforms the traditional UKF with fixed constant process noise covariances in this study. © 2010 IEEE. 2018-09-04T04:44:28Z 2018-09-04T04:44:28Z 2010-12-01 Conference Proceeding 2-s2.0-79952374066 10.1109/ICARCV.2010.5707255 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952374066&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50698
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Computer Science
Engineering
spellingShingle Computer Science
Engineering
Boonsri Kaewkham-ai
Kasemsak Uthaichana
Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
description The disturbance storm time (Dst) index is used for predicting the geomagnetic storm that can affect many systems on earth. The application of the dual unscented Kalman filter (DUKF) to improve the quality of the D st index prediction by simultaneously estimating the process noise covariance is set forth in this paper. In DUKF, two unscented Kalman filters (UKFs) are run in parallel. The UKF applied to a model-based Dst index prediction is so called a state estimator; while the other, a parameter estimator, is for identifying and recursively updating the process noise covariance. The performance comparison between the traditional UKF with fixed constant values of the process noise covariance, and the DUKF are examined. The actual all Dst and the Dst data during the storm (below -80 nT) are used to assess the quality of the predictions. It is found that root mean square error (RMSE) of Dst index prediction using the DUKF is lower than that of the UKF with fixed constant process noise covariances. Specifically, RMSEs of the DUKF are 6.5816 for all Dst and 18.0615 for Dst below -80 nT, whereas, the prediction using a fixed constant process noise covariance yield RMSEs of at least 6.6678 and 19.3954 for all Dst and Dst below -80 nT, respectively. Hence, the DUKF outperforms the traditional UKF with fixed constant process noise covariances in this study. © 2010 IEEE.
format Conference Proceeding
author Boonsri Kaewkham-ai
Kasemsak Uthaichana
author_facet Boonsri Kaewkham-ai
Kasemsak Uthaichana
author_sort Boonsri Kaewkham-ai
title Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
title_short Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
title_full Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
title_fullStr Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
title_full_unstemmed Noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
title_sort noise covariance estimation using dual estimation for disturbance storm time index application
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952374066&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50698
_version_ 1681423636733362176