Electronic structure and optical gain saturation of InAs[sub 1−x]N[sub x]/GaAs quantum dots
The electronic band structures and optical gains of InAs1−xNx /GaAs pyramid quantum dots QDs are calculated using the ten-band k·p model and the valence force field method. The optical gains are calculated using the zero-dimensional optical gain formula with taking into consideration of both ho...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100828 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18168 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The electronic band structures and optical gains of InAs1−xNx /GaAs pyramid quantum dots QDs
are calculated using the ten-band k·p model and the valence force field method. The optical gains
are calculated using the zero-dimensional optical gain formula with taking into consideration of both
homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadenings due to the size fluctuation of quantum dots which
follows a normal distribution. With the variation of QD sizes and nitrogen composition, it can be
shown that the nitrogen composition and the strains can significantly affect the energy levels
especially the conduction band which has repulsion interaction with nitrogen resonant state due to
the band anticrossing interaction. It facilitates to achieve emission of longer wavelength 1.33 or
1.55 m lasers for optical fiber communication system. For QD with higher nitrogen composition,
it has longer emission wavelength and less detrimental effect of higher excited state transition, but
nitrogen composition can affect the maximum gain depending on the factors of transition matrix
element and the Fermi–Dirac distributions for electrons in the conduction bands and holes in the
valence bands respectively. For larger QD, its maximum optical gain is greater at lower carrier
density, but it is slowly surpassed by smaller QD as carrier concentration increases. Larger QD can
reach its saturation gain faster, but this saturation gain is smaller than that of smaller QD. So the
trade-off between longer wavelength, maximum optical, saturation gain, and differential gain must
be considered to select the appropriate QD size according to the specific application requirement. |
---|