Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems

In modern world, most products are make to be as compact as possible but did not reduce the usability of the products. One such product was the robot. It has been notice that some of the robots are compact in size and yet able to complete the objective they have. As they are compact in size, most of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peck, Weixiang
Other Authors: Cheah Chien Chern
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68101
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-68101
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-681012023-07-07T17:39:39Z Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems Peck, Weixiang Cheah Chien Chern School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering DRNTU::Engineering In modern world, most products are make to be as compact as possible but did not reduce the usability of the products. One such product was the robot. It has been notice that some of the robots are compact in size and yet able to complete the objective they have. As they are compact in size, most of them are battery operated and it is definitely a must for them to complete the task before the power runs out. This project will compare the energy efficiency of multi robot system with the use of poweranalyser. It compares two different control methods mainly the Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Close Loop Control with the use of the same controller for each individual method. The test was done by allowing the robot to reach its target location with the help of each control method. The robot was to link with the computer via Bluetooth as the computer works as the central processing unit. The data was being processed by the computer before data was transferred to the robot through Bluetooth. To allow a better comparison, it is recommended to use a different robot for the same test. If the result tallies with the result of this project, we will have a better understanding. Also, we can have a different task to see the energy consumption of the robot and compare the result with this experiment. In conclusion, MPC have a higher advantage as compared to the Close Loop Control as it has a lower energy consumption as compared to the Close Loop Control. Bachelor of Engineering 2016-05-24T05:41:42Z 2016-05-24T05:41:42Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68101 en Nanyang Technological University 76 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering
Peck, Weixiang
Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
description In modern world, most products are make to be as compact as possible but did not reduce the usability of the products. One such product was the robot. It has been notice that some of the robots are compact in size and yet able to complete the objective they have. As they are compact in size, most of them are battery operated and it is definitely a must for them to complete the task before the power runs out. This project will compare the energy efficiency of multi robot system with the use of poweranalyser. It compares two different control methods mainly the Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Close Loop Control with the use of the same controller for each individual method. The test was done by allowing the robot to reach its target location with the help of each control method. The robot was to link with the computer via Bluetooth as the computer works as the central processing unit. The data was being processed by the computer before data was transferred to the robot through Bluetooth. To allow a better comparison, it is recommended to use a different robot for the same test. If the result tallies with the result of this project, we will have a better understanding. Also, we can have a different task to see the energy consumption of the robot and compare the result with this experiment. In conclusion, MPC have a higher advantage as compared to the Close Loop Control as it has a lower energy consumption as compared to the Close Loop Control.
author2 Cheah Chien Chern
author_facet Cheah Chien Chern
Peck, Weixiang
format Final Year Project
author Peck, Weixiang
author_sort Peck, Weixiang
title Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
title_short Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
title_full Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
title_fullStr Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
title_full_unstemmed Energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
title_sort energy saving formation control of multi-robot systems
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68101
_version_ 1772825217188495360