Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose

The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: REB, Jochen, GREGURAS, Gary J.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-2715
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-27152020-04-01T02:17:12Z Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose REB, Jochen GREGURAS, Gary J. The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee ability and effort and that performance variation would affect locus of causality; both predictions were supported by the results. Second, investigating the interaction between dynamic performance and rating purpose. Study 2 predicted that performance mean would have a stronger impact on administrative than on developmental ratings, whereas performance trend and variation would have a stranger impact on developmental than on administrative ratings; again, both predictions were borne out by the results. Third. both studies found that performance trend interacted with performance mean and variability to predict overall ratings. Fourth, both studies replicated main effects of dynamic performance characteristics on ratings in a different culture and, in Study 2, a sample of more experienced managers. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716 info:doi/10.1037/a0017237 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University dynamic performance performance attributions performance evaluation performance ratings rating purpose Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic dynamic performance
performance attributions
performance evaluation
performance ratings
rating purpose
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle dynamic performance
performance attributions
performance evaluation
performance ratings
rating purpose
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
REB, Jochen
GREGURAS, Gary J.
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
description The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee ability and effort and that performance variation would affect locus of causality; both predictions were supported by the results. Second, investigating the interaction between dynamic performance and rating purpose. Study 2 predicted that performance mean would have a stronger impact on administrative than on developmental ratings, whereas performance trend and variation would have a stranger impact on developmental than on administrative ratings; again, both predictions were borne out by the results. Third. both studies found that performance trend interacted with performance mean and variability to predict overall ratings. Fourth, both studies replicated main effects of dynamic performance characteristics on ratings in a different culture and, in Study 2, a sample of more experienced managers.
format text
author REB, Jochen
GREGURAS, Gary J.
author_facet REB, Jochen
GREGURAS, Gary J.
author_sort REB, Jochen
title Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
title_short Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
title_full Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
title_fullStr Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
title_full_unstemmed Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
title_sort understanding performance ratings: dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf
_version_ 1770569996952403968