Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose
The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-2715 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-27152020-04-01T02:17:12Z Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose REB, Jochen GREGURAS, Gary J. The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee ability and effort and that performance variation would affect locus of causality; both predictions were supported by the results. Second, investigating the interaction between dynamic performance and rating purpose. Study 2 predicted that performance mean would have a stronger impact on administrative than on developmental ratings, whereas performance trend and variation would have a stranger impact on developmental than on administrative ratings; again, both predictions were borne out by the results. Third. both studies found that performance trend interacted with performance mean and variability to predict overall ratings. Fourth, both studies replicated main effects of dynamic performance characteristics on ratings in a different culture and, in Study 2, a sample of more experienced managers. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716 info:doi/10.1037/a0017237 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University dynamic performance performance attributions performance evaluation performance ratings rating purpose Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
dynamic performance performance attributions performance evaluation performance ratings rating purpose Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
dynamic performance performance attributions performance evaluation performance ratings rating purpose Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory REB, Jochen GREGURAS, Gary J. Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
description |
The present two studies integrate and extend the literatures on dynamic performance, performance attributions, and rating purpose, making several important contributions. First, examining attributions of dynamic performance, Study 1 predicted that performance mean and trend would affect judged ratee ability and effort and that performance variation would affect locus of causality; both predictions were supported by the results. Second, investigating the interaction between dynamic performance and rating purpose. Study 2 predicted that performance mean would have a stronger impact on administrative than on developmental ratings, whereas performance trend and variation would have a stranger impact on developmental than on administrative ratings; again, both predictions were borne out by the results. Third. both studies found that performance trend interacted with performance mean and variability to predict overall ratings. Fourth, both studies replicated main effects of dynamic performance characteristics on ratings in a different culture and, in Study 2, a sample of more experienced managers. |
format |
text |
author |
REB, Jochen GREGURAS, Gary J. |
author_facet |
REB, Jochen GREGURAS, Gary J. |
author_sort |
REB, Jochen |
title |
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
title_short |
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
title_full |
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
title_fullStr |
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding performance ratings: Dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
title_sort |
understanding performance ratings: dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1716 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2715/viewcontent/EDPPurpose_JAP_InPress.pdf |
_version_ |
1770569996952403968 |