How motivated reasoning and temporal frames may polarize opinions about wildlife disease risk
We draw from theories of motivated reasoning, dual-processing models, and attribution of responsibility to examine how scientific messages may increase public polarization with respect to emerging risk issues such as Lyme disease. A nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 460) read messag...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Sungjong ROH, MCCOMAS, Katherine A., RICKARD, Laura N., DECKER, Daniel J. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4836 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5835/viewcontent/how_motivated_reasoning.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Public understanding of One Health messages: The role of temporal framing
by: Sungjong ROH,, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Media frames and cognitive accessibility: What do "global warming" and "climate change" evoke partisan minds?
by: SCHULDT, Jonathon P., et al.
Published: (2014) -
One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
by: LU, Hang, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Communicating about marine disease: The effects of message frames on policy support
by: MCCOMAS, Katherine A., et al.
Published: (2015) -
How narrative focus and a statistical map shape health policy support among state legislators
by: NIEDERDEPPE, Jeff, et al.
Published: (2016)