One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals

Context Improving awareness to prevent exposure to rabies from bats is a public health priority. However, messages about bats and rabies often sensationalise this issue and represent bats in a negative way, which can negatively affect support for bat conservation. Aims The conflicts between public h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LU, Hang, MCCOMAS, Katherine A., BUTTKE, Danielle E., ROH, Sungjong, WILD, Margaret A., DECKER, Daniel J.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6391
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-63912017-12-29T06:54:07Z One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals LU, Hang MCCOMAS, Katherine A. BUTTKE, Danielle E. ROH, Sungjong WILD, Margaret A. DECKER, Daniel J. Context Improving awareness to prevent exposure to rabies from bats is a public health priority. However, messages about bats and rabies often sensationalise this issue and represent bats in a negative way, which can negatively affect support for bat conservation. Aims The conflicts between public health goals and conservation needs seem unavoidable but are not irreconcilable. Natural resource managers and public health officials can work together to ensure that the importance of preventing exposure to rabies from bats is effectively communicated while at the same time promoting public appreciation of bat species. One efficacious way of achieving this communication goal may be through careful design of message content. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of message design strategies in promoting rabies prevention and bat conservation. Methods This study tested messages in two USA National Park Service sites. Participants (n ≤ 480) were randomly assigned to one of four message conditions as part of a 2 (risk-benefit vs risk-only of bats)×2 (human blame vs bat blame for disease) between-subjects factorial design, or to a control (no message) condition. Key results The results show that all four messages were persuasive in promoting the rabies exposure prevention behaviour compared with the control condition. In addition, when participants were exposed to the bat-blame messages, more positive beliefs about bats were elicited if the messages included risk-benefit information rather than risk-only information. Conclusions Our study suggests that public health and wildlife conservation goals can be obtained simultaneously through careful message design. Implications For messages that focus on just the risk information about bats, we suggest at least mentioning anthropogenic factors contributing to the spread of diseases to avoid unintended negative consequences for bat conservation. If messages emphasise bats as the source for spreading diseases, mentioning the benefits of bats may generate more positive beliefs about bats. Both strategies require some modification of the mainstream messages about bats and rabies to meet both public health and conservation goals. 2017-07-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5392 info:doi/10.1071/WR16061 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business and Corporate Communications Health Communication Life Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business and Corporate Communications
Health Communication
Life Sciences
spellingShingle Business and Corporate Communications
Health Communication
Life Sciences
LU, Hang
MCCOMAS, Katherine A.
BUTTKE, Danielle E.
ROH, Sungjong
WILD, Margaret A.
DECKER, Daniel J.
One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
description Context Improving awareness to prevent exposure to rabies from bats is a public health priority. However, messages about bats and rabies often sensationalise this issue and represent bats in a negative way, which can negatively affect support for bat conservation. Aims The conflicts between public health goals and conservation needs seem unavoidable but are not irreconcilable. Natural resource managers and public health officials can work together to ensure that the importance of preventing exposure to rabies from bats is effectively communicated while at the same time promoting public appreciation of bat species. One efficacious way of achieving this communication goal may be through careful design of message content. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of message design strategies in promoting rabies prevention and bat conservation. Methods This study tested messages in two USA National Park Service sites. Participants (n ≤ 480) were randomly assigned to one of four message conditions as part of a 2 (risk-benefit vs risk-only of bats)×2 (human blame vs bat blame for disease) between-subjects factorial design, or to a control (no message) condition. Key results The results show that all four messages were persuasive in promoting the rabies exposure prevention behaviour compared with the control condition. In addition, when participants were exposed to the bat-blame messages, more positive beliefs about bats were elicited if the messages included risk-benefit information rather than risk-only information. Conclusions Our study suggests that public health and wildlife conservation goals can be obtained simultaneously through careful message design. Implications For messages that focus on just the risk information about bats, we suggest at least mentioning anthropogenic factors contributing to the spread of diseases to avoid unintended negative consequences for bat conservation. If messages emphasise bats as the source for spreading diseases, mentioning the benefits of bats may generate more positive beliefs about bats. Both strategies require some modification of the mainstream messages about bats and rabies to meet both public health and conservation goals.
format text
author LU, Hang
MCCOMAS, Katherine A.
BUTTKE, Danielle E.
ROH, Sungjong
WILD, Margaret A.
DECKER, Daniel J.
author_facet LU, Hang
MCCOMAS, Katherine A.
BUTTKE, Danielle E.
ROH, Sungjong
WILD, Margaret A.
DECKER, Daniel J.
author_sort LU, Hang
title One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
title_short One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
title_full One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
title_fullStr One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
title_full_unstemmed One Health messaging about bats and rabies: How framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
title_sort one health messaging about bats and rabies: how framing of risks, benefits and attributions can support public health and wildlife conservation goals
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5392
_version_ 1770573890277343232