The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being
We examine two different perspectives of interactions outside the organization: the relational work design perspective and the emotional labour perspective. The relational work design perspective suggests that interactions outside the organization have favourable outcomes for employees, whereas the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5986 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6985/viewcontent/Bhave_et_al_2019_JOOP_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6985 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-69852020-04-01T05:41:30Z The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being BHAVE, Devasheesh P. HALLDÓRSSON, Freyr KIM, Eugene LEFTER, Alexandru M. We examine two different perspectives of interactions outside the organization: the relational work design perspective and the emotional labour perspective. The relational work design perspective suggests that interactions outside the organization have favourable outcomes for employees, whereas the emotional labour perspective suggests that such interactions have adverse outcomes for employees. Our goal is to reconcile findings from these two research streams. In Study 1, using data from employees working in diverse occupations, we find that interactions outside the organization have a positive indirect effect on employee well‐being via task significance, and a negative indirect effect on employee well‐being via surface acting. In Study 2, using data collected across two time points, we replicate these findings. In Study 3, we further extend these results and illustrate that interactional autonomy and interactional complexity are influential moderators that shape the strength of the mediated relationships. Our results aid in reconciling and extending findings from two different research streams, and enhance our understanding of the role of interactions outside the organization. 2019-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5986 info:doi/10.1111/joop.12232 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6985/viewcontent/Bhave_et_al_2019_JOOP_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University surface acting task significance interactions outside the organization relational work design emotion regulation employee well-being emotional labour Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
surface acting task significance interactions outside the organization relational work design emotion regulation employee well-being emotional labour Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
surface acting task significance interactions outside the organization relational work design emotion regulation employee well-being emotional labour Human Resources Management Industrial and Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior and Theory BHAVE, Devasheesh P. HALLDÓRSSON, Freyr KIM, Eugene LEFTER, Alexandru M. The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
description |
We examine two different perspectives of interactions outside the organization: the relational work design perspective and the emotional labour perspective. The relational work design perspective suggests that interactions outside the organization have favourable outcomes for employees, whereas the emotional labour perspective suggests that such interactions have adverse outcomes for employees. Our goal is to reconcile findings from these two research streams. In Study 1, using data from employees working in diverse occupations, we find that interactions outside the organization have a positive indirect effect on employee well‐being via task significance, and a negative indirect effect on employee well‐being via surface acting. In Study 2, using data collected across two time points, we replicate these findings. In Study 3, we further extend these results and illustrate that interactional autonomy and interactional complexity are influential moderators that shape the strength of the mediated relationships. Our results aid in reconciling and extending findings from two different research streams, and enhance our understanding of the role of interactions outside the organization. |
format |
text |
author |
BHAVE, Devasheesh P. HALLDÓRSSON, Freyr KIM, Eugene LEFTER, Alexandru M. |
author_facet |
BHAVE, Devasheesh P. HALLDÓRSSON, Freyr KIM, Eugene LEFTER, Alexandru M. |
author_sort |
BHAVE, Devasheesh P. |
title |
The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
title_short |
The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
title_full |
The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
title_fullStr |
The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
title_full_unstemmed |
The differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
title_sort |
differential impact of interactions outside the organization on employee well-being |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5986 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6985/viewcontent/Bhave_et_al_2019_JOOP_pv.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574465427570688 |