Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model

Extending current theories in crisis communication, the authors have developed a more systemic approach to understanding the role of emotions in crises and the strategies used to respond. The authors’ Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model is based on a public-based, emotion-driven perspective where...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JIN, Yan, PANG, A., CAMERON, Glen T.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6643
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7642
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-76422021-01-07T13:06:03Z Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model JIN, Yan PANG, A., CAMERON, Glen T. Extending current theories in crisis communication, the authors have developed a more systemic approach to understanding the role of emotions in crises and the strategies used to respond. The authors’ Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model is based on a public-based, emotion-driven perspective where different crises are mapped on two continua, the organization’s engagement in the crisis and primary public’s coping strategy. The initial test on the first of the four quadrants in the model suggests theoretical rigor in the model and found that publics involved in crises pertaining to reputational damage, technological breakdown, industrial matters, labor unrest, and regulation/legislation, are likely to feel anxious, angry, and sad. At the same time, they are likely to engage in conative coping and take active steps to restore some semblance of normalcy within their immediate environment. As counter-intuitive as this may appear, evidence shows that organizations embroiled in these crises need only to engage moderately, rather than intensely, in reaching out to the publics. This “strategic holding position” affords a situation where organizations are able to assume a qualified-rhetoric-mixed stance, utilizing a mixed bag of strategies ranging from defensive strategies like excuse and justification as well as accommodative strategies like ingratiation and corrective action to engage their publics. This study is the first of a series of studies to generate what Yin (2003) termed “analytic generalization” for the ICM model. The findings from this study, arguably, represent the imprints of an initial trail that may open up to a possibly new vista of research in crisis communication. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6643 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business and Corporate Communications
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business and Corporate Communications
spellingShingle Business and Corporate Communications
JIN, Yan
PANG, A.,
CAMERON, Glen T.
Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
description Extending current theories in crisis communication, the authors have developed a more systemic approach to understanding the role of emotions in crises and the strategies used to respond. The authors’ Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model is based on a public-based, emotion-driven perspective where different crises are mapped on two continua, the organization’s engagement in the crisis and primary public’s coping strategy. The initial test on the first of the four quadrants in the model suggests theoretical rigor in the model and found that publics involved in crises pertaining to reputational damage, technological breakdown, industrial matters, labor unrest, and regulation/legislation, are likely to feel anxious, angry, and sad. At the same time, they are likely to engage in conative coping and take active steps to restore some semblance of normalcy within their immediate environment. As counter-intuitive as this may appear, evidence shows that organizations embroiled in these crises need only to engage moderately, rather than intensely, in reaching out to the publics. This “strategic holding position” affords a situation where organizations are able to assume a qualified-rhetoric-mixed stance, utilizing a mixed bag of strategies ranging from defensive strategies like excuse and justification as well as accommodative strategies like ingratiation and corrective action to engage their publics. This study is the first of a series of studies to generate what Yin (2003) termed “analytic generalization” for the ICM model. The findings from this study, arguably, represent the imprints of an initial trail that may open up to a possibly new vista of research in crisis communication.
format text
author JIN, Yan
PANG, A.,
CAMERON, Glen T.
author_facet JIN, Yan
PANG, A.,
CAMERON, Glen T.
author_sort JIN, Yan
title Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
title_short Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
title_full Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
title_fullStr Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
title_full_unstemmed Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: Testing the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) model
title_sort toward a publics-driven, emotion-based approach in crisis communication: testing the integrated crisis mapping (icm) model
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6643
_version_ 1770575466166484992