Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors

We propose a model of software-as-a-service (SaaS) in a competitive marketplace that brings clarity to the choices that competing vendors must make for pricing and quality strategy. We focus on several features of SaaS competition, including differences in vendor offerings, incomplete information on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MA, Dan, KAUFFMAN, Robert John
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2440
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/3440/viewcontent/06857369.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-3440
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-34402018-07-13T04:06:10Z Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors MA, Dan KAUFFMAN, Robert John We propose a model of software-as-a-service (SaaS) in a competitive marketplace that brings clarity to the choices that competing vendors must make for pricing and quality strategy. We focus on several features of SaaS competition, including differences in vendor offerings, incomplete information on application functionality, the potential lock-in risk of SaaS clients, and their cost of learning about what it will take to make the vendors’ software work well. Clients can sample the fit costs of adoption, but can switch to another vendor. We obtained several findings through the use of a game-theoretic model. First, a client’s switching cost is important for its decision-making regarding SaaS adoption. With a relatively high switching cost, a more cost-efficient vendor of IT services will be able to drive the less cost-efficient competitor out of its market. Second, the impact of the client’s switching cost on vendors works differently. An increase in switching cost enables one vendor to charge a higher price and achieve higher profit, while the other will be forced to charge a lower price and hardly make a profit. Third, what matters is not how much a vendor can enhance service quality, but instead how costly it will be to improve quality enough to attract sufficient customer interest to achieve profitability. 2014-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2440 info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2014.2332633 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/3440/viewcontent/06857369.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Adverse and beneficial lock-in cost efficiency economic analysis quality services sampling software-as-aservice (SaaS) strategy switching costs vendor competition Computer Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Adverse and beneficial lock-in
cost efficiency
economic analysis
quality
services sampling
software-as-aservice (SaaS)
strategy
switching costs
vendor competition
Computer Sciences
spellingShingle Adverse and beneficial lock-in
cost efficiency
economic analysis
quality
services sampling
software-as-aservice (SaaS)
strategy
switching costs
vendor competition
Computer Sciences
MA, Dan
KAUFFMAN, Robert John
Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
description We propose a model of software-as-a-service (SaaS) in a competitive marketplace that brings clarity to the choices that competing vendors must make for pricing and quality strategy. We focus on several features of SaaS competition, including differences in vendor offerings, incomplete information on application functionality, the potential lock-in risk of SaaS clients, and their cost of learning about what it will take to make the vendors’ software work well. Clients can sample the fit costs of adoption, but can switch to another vendor. We obtained several findings through the use of a game-theoretic model. First, a client’s switching cost is important for its decision-making regarding SaaS adoption. With a relatively high switching cost, a more cost-efficient vendor of IT services will be able to drive the less cost-efficient competitor out of its market. Second, the impact of the client’s switching cost on vendors works differently. An increase in switching cost enables one vendor to charge a higher price and achieve higher profit, while the other will be forced to charge a lower price and hardly make a profit. Third, what matters is not how much a vendor can enhance service quality, but instead how costly it will be to improve quality enough to attract sufficient customer interest to achieve profitability.
format text
author MA, Dan
KAUFFMAN, Robert John
author_facet MA, Dan
KAUFFMAN, Robert John
author_sort MA, Dan
title Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
title_short Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
title_full Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
title_fullStr Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
title_full_unstemmed Competition between Software-as-a-Service Vendors
title_sort competition between software-as-a-service vendors
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2014
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2440
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/3440/viewcontent/06857369.pdf
_version_ 1770572147483213824