The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor

We study the relationship between student carelessness and affect among high-school students using a Cognitive Tutor for Scatterplots, using a machine-learned detector of carelessness and field observations of student affect. In line with previous research, we say a student is careless when he/she m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z, Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T, Baker, Ryan S
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/116
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_34
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.discs-faculty-pubs-1115
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.discs-faculty-pubs-11152020-06-25T02:37:33Z The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T Baker, Ryan S We study the relationship between student carelessness and affect among high-school students using a Cognitive Tutor for Scatterplots, using a machine-learned detector of carelessness and field observations of student affect. In line with previous research, we say a student is careless when he/she makes a mistake performing a task that he/she already knows. This construct is also known as slipping. Somewhat non-intuitively, we find that students exhibiting high levels of engaged concentration slip frequently. These findings imply that a student who is engaged in a task may be overconfident, impulsive or hurried, leading to more careless errors. On the other hand, students who display confusion or boredom make fewer careless errors. Further analysis over time suggests that confused and bored students have lower learning overall. Therefore, these students’ mistakes stem from a genuine lack of knowledge rather than carelessness. The use of two versions of the tutor in this study, with and without an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA), shows no significant difference in terms of the relationship between carelessness and affect. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/116 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_34 Department of Information Systems & Computer Science Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Carelessness Slips Engaged Concentration Confusion Boredom Cognitive Tutors Computer Sciences
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Carelessness
Slips
Engaged Concentration
Confusion
Boredom
Cognitive Tutors
Computer Sciences
spellingShingle Carelessness
Slips
Engaged Concentration
Confusion
Boredom
Cognitive Tutors
Computer Sciences
San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
Baker, Ryan S
The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
description We study the relationship between student carelessness and affect among high-school students using a Cognitive Tutor for Scatterplots, using a machine-learned detector of carelessness and field observations of student affect. In line with previous research, we say a student is careless when he/she makes a mistake performing a task that he/she already knows. This construct is also known as slipping. Somewhat non-intuitively, we find that students exhibiting high levels of engaged concentration slip frequently. These findings imply that a student who is engaged in a task may be overconfident, impulsive or hurried, leading to more careless errors. On the other hand, students who display confusion or boredom make fewer careless errors. Further analysis over time suggests that confused and bored students have lower learning overall. Therefore, these students’ mistakes stem from a genuine lack of knowledge rather than carelessness. The use of two versions of the tutor in this study, with and without an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA), shows no significant difference in terms of the relationship between carelessness and affect.
format text
author San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
Baker, Ryan S
author_facet San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
Baker, Ryan S
author_sort San Pedro, Maria Ofelia C.Z
title The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
title_short The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
title_full The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
title_fullStr The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor
title_sort relationship between carelessness and affect in a cognitive tutor
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2011
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/116
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_34
_version_ 1681506672475897856