Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans
This study tests whether gain- and loss-framed messages about establishing obesity-reducing policies have different persuasive effects on Republicans and Democrats. In a randomized between-subject experiment, participants (N = 384) read a message emphasizing either benefits to a society by establish...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
其他作者: | |
格式: | Article |
語言: | English |
出版: |
2020
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142805 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
機構: | Nanyang Technological University |
語言: | English |
總結: | This study tests whether gain- and loss-framed messages about establishing obesity-reducing policies have different persuasive effects on Republicans and Democrats. In a randomized between-subject experiment, participants (N = 384) read a message emphasizing either benefits to a society by establishing policies aimed to reduce obesity (i.e., gain-framed message) or costs to a society that fails to establish those policies (i.e., loss-framed message). Results indicated that Democrats perceived the gain-framed message as more persuasive than the loss-framed message and the perceived argument strength fully mediated the framing effect on Democrats' policy support; however, there was no framing effect on perceived argument strength among Republicans. On the other hand, the gain-framed message led Republicans to attribute the cause of obesity less to the individual level compared to the loss-framed message and the no-message condition. We observed no framing difference among Democrats on causal attributions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. |
---|