Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans
This study tests whether gain- and loss-framed messages about establishing obesity-reducing policies have different persuasive effects on Republicans and Democrats. In a randomized between-subject experiment, participants (N = 384) read a message emphasizing either benefits to a society by establish...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142805 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-142805 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1428052020-07-01T07:41:07Z Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hye Kyung Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Obesity This study tests whether gain- and loss-framed messages about establishing obesity-reducing policies have different persuasive effects on Republicans and Democrats. In a randomized between-subject experiment, participants (N = 384) read a message emphasizing either benefits to a society by establishing policies aimed to reduce obesity (i.e., gain-framed message) or costs to a society that fails to establish those policies (i.e., loss-framed message). Results indicated that Democrats perceived the gain-framed message as more persuasive than the loss-framed message and the perceived argument strength fully mediated the framing effect on Democrats' policy support; however, there was no framing effect on perceived argument strength among Republicans. On the other hand, the gain-framed message led Republicans to attribute the cause of obesity less to the individual level compared to the loss-framed message and the no-message condition. We observed no framing difference among Democrats on causal attributions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. Accepted version 2020-07-01T07:41:07Z 2020-07-01T07:41:07Z 2016 Journal Article Lee, T. K., & Kim, H. K. (2017). Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans. Health Communication, 32(12), 1481-1490. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1230810 1041-0236 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142805 10.1080/10410236.2016.1230810 27824269 2-s2.0-84994558919 12 32 1481 1490 en Health Communication This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Health Communication on 08 Nov 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10410236.2016.1230810 application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Obesity |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Message Framing Obesity Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hye Kyung Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
description |
This study tests whether gain- and loss-framed messages about establishing obesity-reducing policies have different persuasive effects on Republicans and Democrats. In a randomized between-subject experiment, participants (N = 384) read a message emphasizing either benefits to a society by establishing policies aimed to reduce obesity (i.e., gain-framed message) or costs to a society that fails to establish those policies (i.e., loss-framed message). Results indicated that Democrats perceived the gain-framed message as more persuasive than the loss-framed message and the perceived argument strength fully mediated the framing effect on Democrats' policy support; however, there was no framing effect on perceived argument strength among Republicans. On the other hand, the gain-framed message led Republicans to attribute the cause of obesity less to the individual level compared to the loss-framed message and the no-message condition. We observed no framing difference among Democrats on causal attributions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hye Kyung |
format |
Article |
author |
Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hye Kyung |
author_sort |
Lee, Tae Kyoung |
title |
Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
title_short |
Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
title_full |
Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
title_fullStr |
Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
title_sort |
differential effects of message framing on obesity policy support between democrats and republicans |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142805 |
_version_ |
1681056437372977152 |