Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice
To alleviate the negative effects of workplace unfairness and resulting conflict, organizations can take remedial action to atone for a perceived injustice. We argue that the effectiveness of organizational remedies may depend on the match between type of injustice perceived and type of remedy offer...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2629 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3628/viewcontent/PPsych_Final.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3628 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-36282017-12-12T03:13:24Z Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice REB, Jochen GOLDMAN, Barry M. KRAY, Laura J. CROPANZANO, Russell To alleviate the negative effects of workplace unfairness and resulting conflict, organizations can take remedial action to atone for a perceived injustice. We argue that the effectiveness of organizational remedies may depend on the match between type of injustice perceived and type of remedy offered. Specifically, based on the multiple needs model of justice (Cropanzano, Byrne, Bobocel, & Rupp, 2001), we expect procedural injustice to be particularly associated with preference for instrumental remedies that address the need for control. On the other hand, interactional injustice should be particularly associated with preference for punitive remedies that address the need for meaning. Confirming this hypothesis, a field study involving recently terminated employees found that procedural injustice was positively associated with preference for an instrumental remedy (monetary compensation) and interactional injustice was positively associated with preference for a punitive remedy (disciplinary action against those involved in the termination). Further supporting the hypothesis, a laboratory experiment manipulating the unfairness of performance feedback found greater preference for an instrumental remedy relative to a punitive remedy following a procedural injustice than following an interactional injustice. In discussing these results, we present a taxonomy of organizational remedies as they relate to the multiple needs model of justice. Practical implications are discussed. 2006-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2629 info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00773.x. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3628/viewcontent/PPsych_Final.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Interactional Justice Justice Restoration Multiple Needs Model Organizational Remedy Procedural Justice Business Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Interactional Justice Justice Restoration Multiple Needs Model Organizational Remedy Procedural Justice Business Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Interactional Justice Justice Restoration Multiple Needs Model Organizational Remedy Procedural Justice Business Organizational Behavior and Theory REB, Jochen GOLDMAN, Barry M. KRAY, Laura J. CROPANZANO, Russell Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
description |
To alleviate the negative effects of workplace unfairness and resulting conflict, organizations can take remedial action to atone for a perceived injustice. We argue that the effectiveness of organizational remedies may depend on the match between type of injustice perceived and type of remedy offered. Specifically, based on the multiple needs model of justice (Cropanzano, Byrne, Bobocel, & Rupp, 2001), we expect procedural injustice to be particularly associated with preference for instrumental remedies that address the need for control. On the other hand, interactional injustice should be particularly associated with preference for punitive remedies that address the need for meaning. Confirming this hypothesis, a field study involving recently terminated employees found that procedural injustice was positively associated with preference for an instrumental remedy (monetary compensation) and interactional injustice was positively associated with preference for a punitive remedy (disciplinary action against those involved in the termination). Further supporting the hypothesis, a laboratory experiment manipulating the unfairness of performance feedback found greater preference for an instrumental remedy relative to a punitive remedy following a procedural injustice than following an interactional injustice. In discussing these results, we present a taxonomy of organizational remedies as they relate to the multiple needs model of justice. Practical implications are discussed. |
format |
text |
author |
REB, Jochen GOLDMAN, Barry M. KRAY, Laura J. CROPANZANO, Russell |
author_facet |
REB, Jochen GOLDMAN, Barry M. KRAY, Laura J. CROPANZANO, Russell |
author_sort |
REB, Jochen |
title |
Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
title_short |
Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
title_full |
Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
title_fullStr |
Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different Wrongs, Different Remedies? Reactions to Organizational Remedies after Procedural and Interactional Injustice |
title_sort |
different wrongs, different remedies? reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2629 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3628/viewcontent/PPsych_Final.pdf |
_version_ |
1770570494698848256 |