Anchors weigh more than power: Why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes
The current research shows that having no power can be better than having a little power. Negotiators prefer having some power (weak negotiation alternatives) to having no power (no alternatives). We challenge this belief that having any alternative is beneficial by demonstrating that weak alternati...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | SCHAERER, Michael, SWAAB, Roderick I., GALINSKY, Adam D. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5153 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6152/viewcontent/Schaerer__Swaab____Galinsky_PS2015_anchors_weigh_more_than_power.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6152/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/DS_10.11770956797614558718.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Starting high and ending with nothing: The role of anchors and power in negotiations
by: Schweinsberg, M., et al.
Published: (2013) -
Imaginary alternatives: The impact of mental simulation on powerless negotiators
by: SCHAERER, Michael, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Bargaining zone distortion in negotiations: The elusive power of multiple alternatives
by: SCHAERER, Michael, et al.
Published: (2016) -
The too-much precision effect: When and why precise anchors backfire with experts
by: LOSCHELDER, David D., et al.
Published: (2016) -
How to play “friendly hardball” in a negotiation
by: SCHAERER, Michael, et al.
Published: (2020)