What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content
Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7590 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8589/viewcontent/Employer_reviews_main_document_R02_final.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8589 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-85892024-09-21T15:55:49Z What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content HÖLLIG, Christoph E. TUMASJAN, Andranik LIEVENS, Filip Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such open-ended comments relate to the key variable in employer reviews: employers’ favorability rating. Therefore, we start by situating this variable among other constructs in the employer branding space. Next, we build theory on how content in the open-ended comments of an employer review relates to the positivity or negativity of the reviews’ favorability rating. We test our hypotheses via a text-mining analysis of approximately half a million employer reviews. The results reveal an intriguing discrepancy. Although instrumental, impersonal, and cognitive content is more prevalent in employer reviews, symbolic, personal, and emotional content dominates employer reviews’ favorability rating. In terms of practical implications, this result shows that merely inspecting the frequency of attributes mentioned in employer review text comments as a basis for changing company policies of employer branding efforts might be misguided. We discuss implications for theory and future research, and provide our dictionary for further scholarly and practical use.Practitioners PointsEmployer review platforms offer insights into employee perceptions beyond an organization's control.Symbolic, personal, and emotional content, though less frequent, significantly impacts favorability ratings and should be prioritized in branding.Relying solely on attribute frequency in reviews can be misleading.Companies should analyze reviews to uncover key drivers of favorability ratings, improving recruitment strategies. 2024-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7590 info:doi/10.1111/ijsa.12478 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8589/viewcontent/Employer_reviews_main_document_R02_final.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University CATA employer reviews employer image third-party employment branding Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
CATA employer reviews employer image third-party employment branding Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
CATA employer reviews employer image third-party employment branding Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory HÖLLIG, Christoph E. TUMASJAN, Andranik LIEVENS, Filip What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
description |
Employer review platforms have changed the recruitment landscape by allowing current and former employees to post messages about an employer outside of direct company control. Therefore, they have emerged as an important form of third-party employer branding. However, we know little about how such open-ended comments relate to the key variable in employer reviews: employers’ favorability rating. Therefore, we start by situating this variable among other constructs in the employer branding space. Next, we build theory on how content in the open-ended comments of an employer review relates to the positivity or negativity of the reviews’ favorability rating. We test our hypotheses via a text-mining analysis of approximately half a million employer reviews. The results reveal an intriguing discrepancy. Although instrumental, impersonal, and cognitive content is more prevalent in employer reviews, symbolic, personal, and emotional content dominates employer reviews’ favorability rating. In terms of practical implications, this result shows that merely inspecting the frequency of attributes mentioned in employer review text comments as a basis for changing company policies of employer branding efforts might be misguided. We discuss implications for theory and future research, and provide our dictionary for further scholarly and practical use.Practitioners PointsEmployer review platforms offer insights into employee perceptions beyond an organization's control.Symbolic, personal, and emotional content, though less frequent, significantly impacts favorability ratings and should be prioritized in branding.Relying solely on attribute frequency in reviews can be misleading.Companies should analyze reviews to uncover key drivers of favorability ratings, improving recruitment strategies. |
format |
text |
author |
HÖLLIG, Christoph E. TUMASJAN, Andranik LIEVENS, Filip |
author_facet |
HÖLLIG, Christoph E. TUMASJAN, Andranik LIEVENS, Filip |
author_sort |
HÖLLIG, Christoph E. |
title |
What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
title_short |
What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
title_full |
What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
title_fullStr |
What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
title_full_unstemmed |
What drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? The role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
title_sort |
what drives employers’ favorability ratings on employer review platforms? the role of symbolic, personal, and emotional content |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7590 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8589/viewcontent/Employer_reviews_main_document_R02_final.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047901320478720 |