Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence- Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations
Two studies were conducted to examine the implications of an apology versus a denial for repairing trust after an alleged violation. Results reveal that trust was repaired more successfully when mistrusted parties (a) apologized for violations concerning matters of competence but denied culpability...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | KIM, Peter H., FERRIN, Donald L., COOPER, Cecily D., DIRKS, Kurt T. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2368 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3367/viewcontent/RemovingShadowSuspicion_afv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Repairing Trust with Individuals vs. Groups
by: KIM, Peter H., et al.
Published: (2012) -
Silence Speaks Volumes: The Effectiveness of Reticence in Comparison to Apology and Denial for Repairing Integrity- and Competence-Based Trust Violations
by: FERRIN, Donald L., et al.
Published: (2007) -
Silence Speaks Volumes: The Effectiveness of Reticence for Repairing Trust Violations
by: FERRIN, Donald L., et al.
Published: (2005) -
Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Denial Vs Apology for Repairing Competence-Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations
by: FERRIN, Donald L., et al.
Published: (2003) -
Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Denial Vs. Apology for Repairing Trust Violations
by: FERRIN, Donald L., et al.
Published: (2002)