The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis
The current meta-analysis of the selection validity of assessment centres aims to update an earlier meta-analysis of assessment centre validity. To this end, we retrieved 26 studies and 27 validity coefficients (N=5850) relating the Overall Assessment Rating (OAR) to supervisory performance ratings....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | HERMELIN, Eran, LIEVENS, Filip, ROBERTSON, Ivan T. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5776 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6775/viewcontent/Validity_AC_predict_supervisory_perf_sv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Assessing the Robustness of Previous Supervisory Performance Rating Models
by: GREGURAS, Gary J., et al.
Published: (1999) -
Situational tests in student selection: An examination of predictive validity, adverse impact, and construct validity
by: LIEVENS, Filip, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Integrating situational judgment tests and assessment centre exercises into personality research: Challenges and further opportunities
by: LIEVENS, Filip
Published: (2017) -
An Integrated and Expanded Model of Supervisory Performance Ratings
by: GREGURAS, Gary J., et al.
Published: (1999) -
Incremental validity of leaderless group discussion ratings over and above general mental ability and personality in predicting promotion
by: BORTEYROU, Xavier, et al.
Published: (2015)