Pay suppression in social impact contexts: How framing work around the greater good inhibits job candidate compensation demands
Past research suggests that when organizations communicate the benefits of their work for human welfare—that is, use a social impact framing for work—job candidates are willing to accept lower wages because they expect the work to be personally meaningful. We argue that this explanation overlooks a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | HUSSAIN, Insiya, PITESA, Marko, THAU, Stefan, SCHAERER, Michael |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7214 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8213/viewcontent/PaySuppression_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Why employees accept lower pay at mission-oriented companies
by: HUSSAIN, Insiya, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Male immorality: An evolutionary account of sex differences in unethical negotiation behavior
by: LEE, Margaret, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Impact of the board, compensation committee and ownership structure on CEO and director compensation
by: HO MING KEOW
Published: (2010) -
Subjective effectiveness in agent-to-human negotiation: A frame x personality account
by: YANG, Yinping, et al.
Published: (2010) -
RBF-based compensation method on displacement and thermal error
by: Tan, K.K., et al.
Published: (2014)