Correcting for range restriction in meta-analysis: A reply to Oh et al. (2023)
Oh et al. (2023) question a number of choices made in our article (Sackett et al., 2022); here we respond. They interpret our article as recommending against correcting for range restriction in general in concurrent validation studies; yet, we emphasize that we endorse correction when one has access...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | SACKETT, Paul R., BERRY, Christopher M., LIEVENS, Filip, ZHANG, Charlene |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7268 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8267/viewcontent/correcting_for_range.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range
by: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
Published: (2022) -
A cautionary note on the effects of range restriction on predictor intercorrelations
by: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
Published: (2007) -
Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors
by: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
Published: (2023) -
Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests’ role in the validity-diversity trade-Off
by: BERRY, Christopher M., et al.
Published: (2024) -
Implementing Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Structural Equation Models
by: Cheung, M.W.-L.
Published: (2014)